Re: LiveReorg vs Oracle's online reorg capabilities
- From: Mogens Nørgaard <mln@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:41:04 +0200
We don't use reorgs in Denmark. Just because somebody has a nice front
and end you don't have to buy him/her. Save your IO's for later.
Durinda.Jones wrote:
> We are looking at Quest's LiveReorg to determine whether we want to go that
> route for online reorgs or not. Has anyone else out there thought through
> some of these issues? Trying to decide if it's worth the dollars or if
> Oracle 9i will fit the bill. Quest gives you the nice front end to review
> and build your jobs, but is that enough to pay for? I'm not finding a whole
> lot of difference out there. Looks like the functionality is pretty
> similar.
> Pros/cons for either method (other than the $)?
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Durinda Jones
> Yellow Technologies
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
