And if you *are* in the cloud for your DBs, choosing *someone else's* for
the observer also makes a lot of sense.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 2:26 PM Neil Chandler <neil_chandler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Indeed - spinning it up in somebody else’s cloud has real merit, even if
you’re not in the cloud for your db’s
Neil.
sent from my phone
On 26 Feb 2019, at 11:30, Franck Pachot <franck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, just adding that because you don't need to license it, running the
observer in a VM can be a good idea (to keep it available if a site is
down)
Regards,
Franck.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:55 AM Ramnivas Chaurasia <
ramnivaschaurasia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for your inputs!
Regards,
Ramniwas
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:27 AM Purav Chovatia <puravc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Observer is not a server. It’s a small footprint client.
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 8:22 AM, Ramnivas Chaurasia <
ramnivaschaurasia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know if we require separate license for Oracle Observer
process/server even though we already have Active DataGuard license?
Observer server will be a totally separate server without any Oracle DB
running on that. I couldn't find any specific mentioning of Observer server
or FSFO in their licensing price list.
Thanks in advance!
Ramniwas
--
*Franck Pachot*
Rue des Fossés Dessous 27
CH-1170 AUBONNE - Suisse
Tél: +41 79 963 27 22
