Re: Datafile HWM without querying dba_extents

  • From: "Deepak Sharma" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "sharmakdeep_oracle@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: "jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 18:57:58 +0000 (UTC)

I tried this in our Dev DB for 2 files (50 and 51). I was able to resize both 
of these by 1 byte to begin with, which means that there is Free Space at the 
end of the file.
The problem I see is in the calculation to determine whether the Free Space 
chunk for Max(block_id) was indeed at the end of the file (by comparing the 
extent size with total file size). 

What am I missing? It could be that the extent size calculation for these 2 
files are different. I know that they are in 2 separate tabespaces using LMT as 
well as ASSM.

=============FILE:50=============
SQL> select bytes from dba_data_files where file_id=50;

     BYTES
----------
  53477376

1 row selected.

SQL> alter database datafile 50 resize 53477375;

Database altered.

-- Resize it back to its original sizeSQL> alter database datafile 50 resize 
53477376;
Database altered.
SQL> select file_id, block_id, bytes, blocks from dba_free_space where 
file_id=50
  2  and block_id = (select max(block_id) from dba_free_space where file_id=50);

   FILE_ID   BLOCK_ID      BYTES     BLOCKS
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
        50       6409     983040        120

1 row selected.

SQL> select 6408*8192 + 120*8192 from dual;

6408*8192+120*8192
------------------
          53477376     <=== MATCHES the FILE_SIZE
1 row selected.

=============FILE:51=============
SQL> select bytes from dba_data_files where file_id=51;
     BYTES
----------
 840294400

1 row selected.

SQL> alter database datafile 51 resize 840294399;

Database altered.

-- Resize it back to its original size
SQL> alter database datafile 51 resize 840294400;
Database altered.
SQL> select file_id, block_id, bytes, blocks from dba_free_space where 
file_id=51
  2  and block_id = (select max(block_id) from dba_free_space where file_id=51);

   FILE_ID   BLOCK_ID      BYTES     BLOCKS
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
        51      75625  220725248      26944

1 row selected.SQL> select 75624*8192 + 26944*8192 from dual;

75624*8192+26944*8192
---------------------
            840237056        <=== DOES NOT MATCH the FILE_SIZE

1 row selected.
 

     On Saturday, January 31, 2015 11:55 PM, Jonathan Lewis 
<jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
   

 
Your case 2 comment is correct - but if you do a resize datafile aimed at the 
highest starting block and it fails you know that you can't shrink the file.  
Alternatively, if you check the start block and block count and find that that 
doesn't take you to the end of file then you know that you can't resize the 
file downwards.



   
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
@jloracle 
From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender 
"sharmakdeep_oracle@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
Sent: 31 January 2015 21:21
To: Jonathan Lewis; dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Datafile HWM without querying dba_extents

Thanks for sharing your thoughts, esp.  getting the TS dump (will give it a 
try).
As for the dba_free_space, I have 2 datafile cases as below (T- Used, x - 
Empty) :
Case1: 

01234567890123456789
xxTTxxxxTTxxxxxxxxxx

Case2: 

01234567890123456789
xxTTxxxxxxxxxxxxxxTT
In Case1, the contiguous free space for max block_id (per dba_free_space) would 
begin at BlkId 10
In Case2, the max blockid for free chunk would begin at BlkId 5, but we really 
cannot shrink that Datafile, since the last blocks are already used.
So, the MAX(block_id) for a given File_Id, in dba_free_space may not 
necessarily point to the free blocks at the 'End' of a datafile.

Regards,
Deepak


On Saturday, January 31, 2015 4:58 AM, Jonathan Lewis 
<jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


#yiv1377546528 #yiv1377546528 #yiv1377546528 BODY 
{direction:ltr;font-family:Tahoma;color:#000000;font-size:10pt;}#yiv1377546528 
P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}

On second thoughts, why are you querying dba_extents to find where last used 
block id is ?  If all you want to do is shrink the datafile then querying 
user_free_space (ordered by file id and block id) will allow you to find the 
starting block of the highest free area in file.
You only need to query dba_extents if you think you've got a lot of space lower 
down the file and think that moving a couple of small objects might be 
sufficient to clear the way to releasing it.



   
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
@jloracle 
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf 
of Deepak Sharma [dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 31 January 2015 05:57
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Datafile HWM without querying dba_extents

In order to resize a datafile to release space at the end, we need to find 
whatever the last block_id that is at the start of that free contiguous space.

Problem is that we have a very large database such that querying dba_extents to 
find the last block is probably not an option. The standard query(ies) that 
make use of dba_extents runs for hours at stretch and also  sometimes fails 
with a 'snapshot too old' (just gives up).
Is there an alternative to using dba_extents?
For example, if the datafile size is 100mb and the last 10mb is vacant, I want 
to know the block_id of where that 10mb begins.





   

Other related posts: