Re: Data Guard Management Interfaces

  • From: Fuad Arshad <fuadar@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:43:09 -0500

I'm using a mix scripts grid and dgmgrl which works if the setup is not 
complicated the dg menu developed by Joe Meeks and team and detailed in the 
oracle dataguard 11g handbook works for oracle 10 databases too 

Fuad


On Jul 29, 2010, at 12:26 PM, "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> Hi List,
> 
>  
> 
> I’m just getting started with Data Guard and curious which management 
> interface those with extensive experience would recommend?  I am very 
> comfortable with the command line and use SQL*Plus for 99% of my DBA tasks.  
> I’m not currently running Grid Control – I just start up DB Control briefly 
> when needed and then shut it back down.  Am I better off just using the 
> SQL*Plus commands for DG, or should I use the command-line version of DG 
> Broker (DGMGRL), or is it worth setting up Grid Control just  for the 
> convenience of the GUI for managing Data Guard?  Based on my previous 
> experience testing Grid Control (more trouble than it’s worth in my opinion), 
> and comfort level with the command-line, I’m leaning towards one of the CLI 
> options – either SQL*Plus or DGMGRL.  Eventually I’ll probably take the time 
> to learn them both and decide for myself which one I like better, but I’m 
> just curious which one you Data Guard experts would recommend to start with 
> and any major pros or cons of any of them.
> 
>  
> 
> I’m running Oracle 10.2.0.4 on AIX6.1 and just setting up a simple 
> configuration with one physical standby.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brandon
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or 
> attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not 
> consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions 
> and other information in this message that do not relate to the official 
> business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
> it.

Other related posts: