Re: DWH varchar2(4000)
- From: Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "fuzzy.graybeard@xxxxxxxxx" <fuzzy.graybeard@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 16:18:33 -0600
The only advantage of this design appears to be infinite flexibility. I can't
help but wonder if the table and column names are some sort of sequential
numbering scheme. The disadvantage of course is it is not really suited for
any specific use. It's really just a generic database. I expect there is also
some sort of key table that explains the row and column layout for each
customer.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 24, 2014, at 2:28 PM, Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 24/12/2014 12:34 PM, Dave Morgan wrote:
>> There is no ROI in the modelling custom column sizes unless there is an
>> impact on the client.
> Which is great, since that allows us to implement a variety of (very
> expensive) Quality tools that seem to have the function of replacing decent
> models.
>
> ;-)
> /Hans
Other related posts:
