RE: ASM - is it overkill for a small database
- From: "Matthew Zito" <mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <peter.schauss@xxxxxxx>, "Oracle L" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:24:13 -0400
I would just leave it as a regular filesystem - there's no real
advantage to using ASM, and your sysadmins are no doubt more used to
dealing with filesystems than ASM.
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schauss, R. Peter
(IT Solutions)
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 11:16 AM
To: Oracle L
Subject: ASM - is it overkill for a small database
I am in the very early planning stages for a small database (Oracle
10g), probably no larger than 10 gb/200 users, probably running on a
Windows server. Would it make sense to use ASM or is it overkill for an
instance of this size?
Thanks,
Peter Schauss
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
