RE: 9.2.0.5 database server patch on Windows 2000
- From: "M Rafiq" <rafiq9857@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, sean.oniell@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 10:40:59 -0400
Hi,
Has anybody upgraded 8.1.7.4 database to 9.2.0.5. I have done 8.1.7.4 to
9.2.0.4 but couple of databases to be upgraded to 9.2.0.5.
Any issues etc.
TIA,
Regards
Rafiq
From: "Koivu, Lisa" <Lisa.Koivu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <sean.oniell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: 9.2.0.5 database server patch
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 07:58:13 -0400
Hi Sean,=20
I applied Patchset 9205 on Windows 2003. Patchset apply was
straightforward without errors and the databases came back up and ran
without incident.
Lisa
-----Original Message-----
From: O'Neill, Sean [mailto:Sean.ONeill@xxxxxxxxxx]=20
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 9:12 AM
To: 'List, Oracle-l Freelists'
Subject: 9.2.0.5 database server patch
We are currently using Oracle 9.2.0.4 on Windows 2000 and are
considering
applying patch set 9.2.0.5 but would like to verify its stability first.
Has anybody applied the Oracle 9.2.0.5 database server patch set? Any
feedback or issues with this patch set?
Normally I would wait a bit longer after the patch set release date
(01-April in this case) but project timelines are pushing earlier
consideration.
In brief, would you recommend applying the patch set now or waiting
until a
later date?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"The sender believes that this E-Mail and any attachments were free of =
any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent. This =
message and its attachments could have been infected during =
transmission. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the =
recipient accepts full responsibility for taking proactive and remedial =
action about viruses and other defects. The sender's business entity is =
not liable for any loss or damage arising in any way from this message =
or its attachments."
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_________________________________________________________________
Check out the coupons and bargains on MSN Offers! http://youroffers.msn.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
- » RE: 9.2.0.5 database server patch on Windows 2000
