RE: 12c on HPUX (Was: Oracle DBAs Needed in Kansas)
- From: Dustin Hayden <DHayden@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "aachleon@xxxxxxxxx" <aachleon@xxxxxxxxx>, "hurleyjohnb@xxxxxxxxx" <hurleyjohnb@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:25:27 +0000
Their tech support is very poor now as well. Especially with the overseas
support.
Twice I have had one of them refuse to escalate a SR.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Aaron Leonard
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 7:45 PM
To: hurleyjohnb@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tim@xxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 12c on HPUX (Was: Oracle DBAs Needed in Kansas)
As somebody who is planning a 3rd one-off patch implementation, this month
alone, to address availability issues, I can say that I'm not seeing that QA
has improved on Solaris.
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, John Hurley wrote:
> My unfortunate opinion ... Oracle QA is not what it used to be on most
> every platform including linux also.
>
>
> Maybe it is getting better now on solaris ... dunno ... but maybe.
>
> Things started getting pretty shaky coming out from oracle for hpux
> back in the
> 9.2 days ...
>
> Guess I am getting old and grumpy but dang hpux and solaris both used
> to be pretty well shaken out. They would even install cleanly!
>
> C'est la vie ...
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
