Great observation. I would also add that v$rman_compression_algorithm lists MEDIUM with a compatibility of 11.1 which suggests pretty strongly that it's just an alias for ZLIB, since the underlying code must exist in 11gR1 to have this compatibility. Martin Berger pointed out to me his old blog post comparing stack traces between BASIC and HIGH. http://berxblog.blogspot.co.at/2011/11/bzip2-twice.html Function names suggest that BASIC was an internal implementation of bz2. Looking at the stack and function names for HIGH, I actually think it's very likely Oracle simply used Julian Seward's libbzip2 directly instead of using their own implementation. You can download the source from bzip.org yourself, but it has an entry function called BZ2_bzCompress() which calls a function called handle_compress() which calls a function called BZ2_compressBlock() ... doesn't seem like just coincidence to me. :) lzo/zlib/bz2 is a pretty logical progression - imho it makes sense. just nice to have a little evidence that this is actually the case! also, it seems that blog posts on the internet which suggest Oracle only changed the buffer size between BASIC and HIGH are incorrect; they may have completely switched implementations. -J -- http://about.me/jeremy_schneider On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Yong Huang <yong321@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Maybe we can guess at some algorithms from what's in > v$rman_compression_algorithm. > > ALGORITHM_ ALGORITHM_DESCRIPTION > ---------- ------------------------------------------- > BZIP2 good compression ratio > BASIC good compression ratio > LOW maximum possible compression speed > ZLIB balance between speed and compression ratio > MEDIUM balance between speed and compression ratio > HIGH maximum possible compression ratio > > It's possible Basic means BZIP2 because they have the same description, > and Medium means ZLIB. > > From x$ksppi, parameter _backup_lzo_size means "specifies buffer size for > LOW compression" so we know Low means LZO. > > The only remaining one we don't know is High. > > Of course, this is not official answer. The guess could be wrong. > >