As a director of a consulting company, I highly recommend customers to move to 10g as fast as humanely possible. Preferably with RAC thrown in. In fact Morten Egan and I were just called out today to a site, where they're not completely stupid all day long - in fact they're usually pretty damn good - and when we reached them (we drove as fast as we could in my new car, ie 42 km/h, which is about 8 miles per hour in your country) they were on re-install # 8. When we left a few hours later, the number had climbed to 13, and Morten Egan will be back there tomorrow to continue with install attempts 14 thru 42. Oh, it's 10g (the new one), it's RAC, it's on a Windows cluster, and ASM is involved (and somebody I won't name in Oracle had told them that, yes, redo logs can be on ASM, too). Rock'n'roll. I think this will be another fantastic financial year for Miracle. Mogens Pete Sharman wrote: > Well, hell it wasn't me. :) > > I gotta wonder what the reasoning is here. Most of the customers I deal wi= > th have one reason for moving to 9i instead of 10g - ISV support. If you'r= > e using an application which is either custom built or written by an ISV wi= > th 10g support, why would you bother upgrading to 9i and then upgrading aga= > in to 10g? That seems pretty damn stupid to me, particularly now the 10.1.= > 0.3 patch is out (to satisfy those "I won't upgrade till the first patch re= > lease" bigots ;). > > = > > Pete > = > ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------