[optimal] Re: optimal Digest V4 #197
- From: Jonathan Shankle <jonathan.shankle@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:15:00 -0400
Dennis is absolutely right.. digital sensors are far more sensitive that
their analog counterparts, and detail is often seen in the control images.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Dennis Thayer
<dennisthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Ryan,
>
> It's not unusual for digital systems to show some detail in the retina
> before the dye is seen. This may be due to the different spectral response
> than film has.
>
> Dennis Thayer
> UW-FPRC
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: FreeLists Mailing List Manager <ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Oct 19, 2013 12:14 AM
> >To: optimal digest users <ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: optimal Digest V4 #197
> >
> >optimal Digest Fri, 18 Oct 2013 Volume: 04 Issue: 197
> >
> >In This Issue:
> > [optimal] FA Filters
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >From: "Nelson, Ryan" <RNelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: [optimal] FA Filters
> >Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 19:14:19 +0000
> >
> >Hello all,
> >How often does everyone change out their FA filters? We seem to be
> getting a small amount of pseudofluorescence when shooting control frames
> at a high flash setting. We use Zeiss FF450s with OIS. Any feedback is
> appreciated, thank you for your time.
> >
> >
> >[Description: signature4]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------
> >
> >End of optimal Digest V4 #197
> >*****************************
> >
>
>
> Dennis Thayer
>
>
--
Other related posts:
