We have a foot petal in our testing rooms so we can wait until patients sit
down to turn the lights off, and pop them back on when they're finished!
With appropriate warning, of course. 😉
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020, 11:49 AM CPMC Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Seems to me the lights off is a vestigial nod to the days of squinting
through an eyepiece
We normally keep all rooms at a moderate light level- enough for patients
to see; low enough that the bright lights of a hospital environment don’t
induce us to start confessing secret thoughts!
Denice
Denice Barsness, CRA, COMT, CDOS, FOPS
CPMC Dept of Ophthalmology/ The Eye Institute
Ophthalmic Diagnostic Services
711 Van Ness Avenue Suite 250
San Francisco CA 94109
415-600-5781
FAX 415-558-7011
*From:* Barsness, Denice
*Sent:* Monday, June 08, 2020 6:26 AM
*To:* CPMC Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center <cpmceyelab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* FW: [**External**] [optimal] lights on or lights turned down
------------------------------
*From:* optimal-bounce@freelists.orgOn Behalf OfStuart Alfred
*Sent:* Monday, June 8, 2020 6:25:20 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US &
Canada)
*To:* OPTIMAL
*Subject:* [**External**] [optimal] lights on or lights turned down
*WARNING: *This email originated outside of the Sutter Health email
system!
*DO NOT CLICK* links if the sender is unknown and never provide your User
ID or Password.
For years now I've debated in my head:
on high volume Cirrus OCT clinics, is it worth the effort to be turning
the room lights (fluorescent and or tungsten), off or down when low
vision/AMD patients are walking in and out of the room and testing every 5
minutes.
How degradative are ambient wavelengths of light (fluor/tung) on posterior
OCT imaging using the Cirrus?
My view, I don't observe any discernible 'noise' and have defaulted to
mostly leaving lights up, unless it is a unique case of some sort.
Your all's thoughts, please?
Stu
Stuart Alfred / 317-517-9455 / stuart.alfred@xxxxxxxxx
