[optimal] Re: Pupillometry

  • From: C VandenHoven <cynthia.vandenhoven@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 19:59:25 -0500

Here Here!

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 6:18 PM Barsness Denice <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

I am unclear on the “retina focused group”.  I believe optimal is for
ophthalmic imagers.     By my count, ophthalmic imaging includes slit lamp,
ultrasound, specular micrography, glaucoma, neuro, cataract, etc etc.



I’d like to think by 2021 we were a bit more inclusive.  Even topography
and visual field by definition are “imaging”. *Imaging is the
representation or reproduction of an object's form*



Respectfully,

D. Barsness



*From:* optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> *On
Behalf Of *Jim Soque
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 17, 2021 2:02 PM
*To:* Joe Warnicki <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* [optimal] Re: [**External**] Pupillometry



*WARNING: *This email originated outside of the Sutter Health email
system!
*DO NOT CLICK* links if the sender is unknown and never provide your User
ID or Password.



I don't think so in a retina focused group Denice.

Perhaps give the ATPO crowd a shout.

Thanks,

Jim

www.island-retina.com
<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.island-retina.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Ccpmceyelab%40sutterhealth.org%7C1d2c6ff280cd4f37d4e608d9aa16054b%7Caef453eadaa243e0be62818066e9ff63%7C0%7C0%7C637727833823271717%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=R1zQEhHHY5VrzakZeC1I0ZzJaCSBrjXTwxEljT8uvKA%3D&reserved=0>

www.opsweb.org
<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.opsweb.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7Ccpmceyelab%40sutterhealth.org%7C1d2c6ff280cd4f37d4e608d9aa16054b%7Caef453eadaa243e0be62818066e9ff63%7C0%7C0%7C637727833823271717%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=NbPpIudV49XlexqyyI2qlXK5TgmhpC0UFB%2BwXFBSBAg%3D&reserved=0>













On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 10:02 AM Paul Paquette <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Nope.







-----Original Message-----
From: CPMC Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, Nov 2, 2021 11:06 am
Subject: [optimal] Re: [**External**] Pupillometry

Crickets. Anyone out there?

*From:* Barsness, Denice <BarsneD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Thursday, October 21, 2021 1:21 PM
*To:* CPMC Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center <cpmceyelab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* FW: [**External**] [optimal] Pupillometry
------------------------------

*From:* optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>On
Behalf OfBarsness Denice <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Thursday, October 21, 2021 1:20:23 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time
(US & Canada)
*To:* optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* [**External**] [optimal] Pupillometry

Anyone out there doing Pupillometry

Using the VIP300 Pupillometer

I have a Haag Streit IM900 video imaging system

Couldn’t we just measure pupils under photopic/scotopic conditions and
infrared light with this instrument?

Denice


Other related posts: