Same here. It has pros and cons, but when i actually used it on patients, it definitely performed better than my expectations, and only about 100k cheaper than the Retcam for FA... The basic idea of an SLR-like series of lenses ("modules") is nice as well - theoretically means the future may hold more varied uses. sandor On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:01 PM, George Henry, CRA, PBT <ghenry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I just tested the OIS EyeScan last week… pretty impressive, very > cost-effective. Just buy the modules you need (anterior segment, tear film, > anterior fluorescence, non-mydriatic color fundus, mydriatic fundus, and > FA), under $24K for a portable FA system. > > > > George E. Henry, CRA, PBT > Wheaton Eye Clinic, Ltd. > > This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or > protected health information that is of a sensitive nature, and may be used > only by the person or entity to which it is addressed subject to applicable > law. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, the reader > is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please > notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail > immediately. > > ________________________________ > > From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of LeRoy Judkins > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:36 > > To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: davidn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [optimal] Portable FA Cameras > > > > Does anyone know of a good portable FA camera? Thanks and have a great day. > > > > Jud > > > > LeRoy D. Judkins, COT, OCT-C > > Eye Associates Northwest, PC > > 1101 MADISON > > SUITE 600 > > SEATTLE, WA 98104 > > Clinic Number: 206-215-2020 > > Cell Number: 206-553-9641 > > > > > > ________________________________ > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3868 - Release Date: 08/30/11