That's the trouble; if he is sighted, then he cannot possibly understand that. That would frustrate me, too. No scanner, however good it can be, can possibly take the place of the Optacon; it is portable, you can carry it with you if you wish, camera adjustment is flexible. Need I say more? I don't mean to come off as sounding harsh, but and I say this: I wish someone would design a smaller Optacon with a longer-life battery. Oh, perhaps it is just asking too much. Maybe I am crazy to dream a dream that might not come true anyway. You are right about the R1D; I guess I shouldn't knock it since that is the only model I have hands-on over the years since I started in 1994. I am grateful we have anyone who repairs them today; too many good things have been rendered obsolete and I miss the older equipment. Call me Rip van Winkle if you want to, but think about it, anyway. I miss things like reel to reel tapes and high quality cassettes that do not go downhill in a flash, and quality equipment that lasted and lasted. What a crime the world we live in when people on fixed incomes cannot afford to repair those things anymore and keep them going. I am loaded with broken stuff I hate to throw out into the trash. My lament, and I apologize for that, but I cannot help it. I hope the Optacon never goes that way, but you just don't know how long anyone might be around and that's the thing, isn't it? Marie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anne Robertson" <anne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <optacon-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 2:35 AM Subject: [optacon-l] Re: A question > Hello Cordelia, > > I think the project you are referring to would be the P2RD developed by > Oleg Tretiakov. He touted it as a replacement for the Optacon, but it was > nothing of the sort. It was a similar idea to the KNFB Reader, in that it > used a camera to take pictures of text which were then interpreted using > Abbyy FineReader. The whole thing ran on a PC Notebook computer. > > I had many a long argument with Mr Tretiakov after buying his device and > being seriously disappointed with it. He simply refused to understand that > his device was just another scan and OCR solution and no replacement > whatsoever for the Optacon. > > Cheers, > > Anne > > > On Aug 1, 2010, at 6:25 AM, Cordelia Scharpf wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> I have been following the discussion about different models of the >> Optacons and the arrays with 100 >> vs. 144 pins for a while. My question is whethere there was not someone >> in Florida trying to design >> a new Optacon? I came across him and his project about two or three years >> ago, and his project was >> funded by National Institute of science, if I remember correctly. Do you >> know anything more about >> this? >> >> Best regards, >> Cordelia >> >> to view the list archives, go to: >> >> www.freelists.org/archives/optacon-l >> >> To unsubscribe at any time, just send a message to: >> >> optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" (without the >> quotes) in the message subject. >> >> Tell your friends about the list. They can subscribe by sending a >> message to: >> >> optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "subscribe" (without the >> quotes) in the message subject. >> > > to view the list archives, go to: > > www.freelists.org/archives/optacon-l > > To unsubscribe at any time, just send a message to: > > optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" (without the > quotes) in the message subject. > > Tell your friends about the list. They can subscribe by sending a message > to: > > optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "subscribe" (without the > quotes) in the message subject. > to view the list archives, go to: www.freelists.org/archives/optacon-l To unsubscribe at any time, just send a message to: optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" (without the quotes) in the message subject. Tell your friends about the list. They can subscribe by sending a message to: optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "subscribe" (without the quotes) in the message subject.