On Nov 4, 2014, at 9:44 PM, Manfredi, Albert E <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Craig, I'm just trying to point out, as I have said many times already, that > when you "dig in" as you are doing now, you end up with egg on your face. Works both ways. We could both make an omelette... > > I can certainly go back to your equally inflexible, stubborn opinions about > HDTV being a niche product, in spite of literally everyone pointing out that > it wouldn't be for long, and that it wasn't designed to be niche, and I can > go back to your stubborn certainty about the cost of built-in ATSC reception. > Or about screen aspect ratios. Or any number of other subjects. For some > reason, you cannot get beyond what was true in the past, until way past the > time when the change became fact. Many of my positions were about timing, not the ultimate outcome. And in each case I was right, EXCEPT for the cost of ATSC tuners. It took more than a decade for broadcasters to embrace HDTV, except for programs already being shot on film, which were already HD in terms of the source resolution. Hollywood rejected 16:9. They continue to use many wide screen aspect ratios and to letterbox on 16:9 screens. The Internet is aspect ratio agnostic. Only broadcasters support 16:9, just as they supported 4:3 for decades. I was right about progressive scan and the need for extensibility as well. As I predicted, we are now looking at a completely new, not backward compatible ATSC broadcast standard, because ATSC 1.0 was so poorly designed. Regards Craig ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.