Thanks, Monty, for posting that article. This is why I don't like the bundling in MVPD services. I really don't want to pay for and support programming that I believe has a negative impact on our society. I think a_la care might help, allowing me to purchase what I do want to watch and not what I find degrading to our society. I don't quite understand the argument that a la carte is not technically possible. Case in point, premium channels. For me, it suggests that bundling isn't a technological issue but rather a monetary strategy. Unfortunately, I thought my alternative would be to forgo the MVPD (and my favorite sports) for a subscription streaming service--in my case, Netflix. Alas, Netflix is now producing original material that I wouldn't categorize as having "uplifting" values. Yet I still subscribe for the pleasure of commercial-free programming of what I do enjoy. So I guess I can't be too outspoken of my conscience objection to what is on the MVPD services. But now I wonder, will the same overt nudity spill over to broadcast, as the networks, and the courts, so adamantly want? It appears to me that there isn't much hope of keeping at least one service that has high standards. Obviously, the marketplace bears what the people want. I just wish we had options in the marketplace rather than having to have everything in one place, thus, the need to prop up all of it. Dan Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:13:15 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <monty@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Say Yes to Undress, Then Things Get Complicated Baring All on 'Dating Naked' and 'Skin Wars' By NEIL GENZLINGER JULY 16, 2014 In case you missed the news that traditional courtship is dead, naked people on VH1 stand ready to enlighten you. And in case you thought that television networks had evolved beyond trying to attract viewers with cheesy titillation - ditto. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/17/arts/television/baring-all-on-dating-naked-and-skin-wars.html ------------------------------