I always liked the patent to the fuzzy keyhole that you could find by feel in the dark. Al ----- Original Message ----- From: "Meehan, John" <JMeehan@xxxxxxx> To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 4:55 PM Subject: [opendtv] Re: Is TiVo the bully of DVR design? - patents > Want a laugh over the weekend? Check out this link.. > > http://www.freepatentsonline.com/crazy.html > > I've heard that #6368227 - "Method of swinging on a swing" was filed > before the dot-com crash by a lawyer & his young son, to show him how to > file, and that the system is really broken. > > It was around the same time that Amazon was awarded the "1-click > ordering" patent. > > John Meehan > JVC > > > -----Original Message----- > From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Tom Barry > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 4:43 PM > To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [opendtv] Re: Is TiVo the bully of DVR design? > > I really don't know what to do about our silly unworkable patent system. > > I suppose I'm lucky it is not my problem to solve. > > Some inventions are just inevitable due to the availability of other > emerging technology. It is still nice to reward those who notice them > first but giving a monopoly to the first person making it to the market > or the patent office can't really do much to further the common good. > > There should be some way to incentivize practical new ideas without > otherwise crippling the march of those ideas by giving them to lawyers. > > Can anyone imagine a workable system? > > - Tom > > Manfredi, Albert E wrote: > > Amazing unfolding of events. The courts have affirmed their previous > > decision that copy-while-playing-back is a TiVo exclusive feature and > > not something every DVR can be expected to offer. And the Hollywood > > studios continue to oppose the idea of a virtual DVR in the cable > > network. > > > > Makes it look like TiVo is the only DVR game in town. And none of this > > hinges on vague arguments about GUI or EPG or other such TiVo > > cleverness. > > > > Bert > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > http://www.digitaltvdesignline.com/howto/settopboxdesign/192204952 > > > > August 24, 2006 > > > > Is TiVo the bully of DVR design? > > > > By Cliff Roth > > > > For digital video recorder designers Friday August 18 may go down in > > history as a dark day. A U.S. Circuit Court judge in East Texas upheld > > an April jury decision that EchoStar, parent of the popular Dish > > satellite-TV service, had violated patents awarded to TiVo in their > DVR > > set top boxes. At issue was not TiVo's clever user interface (by > > contrast EchoStar's is quite clunky) or anything else that most > > designers would think of as TiVo-specific. Rather, it was something > much > > broader, more basic, and what most engineers would probably consider > > rather essential to the proper functioning of any DVR: the ability to > > simultaneously record and play--that is, writing to the hard drive > while > > reading from the same drive. > > > > The jury awarded TiVo some $89 million in damages, although they said > > EchoStar acted in good faith when designing their set top boxes. An > > initial order to immediately de-activate some four million EchoStar > DVR > > boxes was delayed, pending an appeal. > > > > If the jury's decision continues to be upheld, the effects for set top > > box industry can be devastated. A patent-holder is under no obligation > > to license their intellectual property, and TiVo can ultimately > require > > that not just EchoStar, but also DirecTV, Scientific Atlanta, > Motorola, > > Pioneer, and every other manufacturer and service provider for > cable-TV > > and satellite-TV boxes will have to recall their products or disable > the > > ability to play and record simultaneously. Or switch to TiVo branded > > service. > > > > If that happens, TiVo would have a virtual monopoly on the DVR market. > > > > It wouldn't be the first time that a single company essentially locked > > up a major aspect of interactive TV with aggressive patent litigation. > > That was precisely Gemstar's strategy, with the electronic program > guide > > (EPG). Gemstar has claimed, through a variety of lawsuits, their > patents > > (purchased, incidentally, from the now-defunct StarSight) essentially > > cover the very idea of the EPG. A few years back, in fact, they sued > > TiVo, resulting in an out-of-court settlement. That settlement, of > > course, was not just monetary but insured that TV Guide (Gemstar's > EPG) > > would be a part of TiVo products. > > > > Similarly, this is likely TiVo's ultimate plan: Rather than forcing > > EchoStar, DirecTV, Time Warner, Comcast and everyone else from > marketing > > set top boxes with built-in DVRs, they want all these companies to > > switch to TiVo's branded DVR service. > > > > In the ten short years since DVRs first appeared on the market, we've > > already seen innovation stifled to the point where there's been > > practically nothing new for quite a while, other than upgrading to > HDTV. > > RePlay, the most innovative company in the field, following a > > Hollywood-backed lawsuit and bankruptcy ultimately stopped making set > > top boxes completely last December. > > > > Now TiVo threatens to really put the nail in the coffin of any future > > DVR innovation. Isn't the ability to simultaneously record and play on > a > > hard disk really a generic capability of any DVR? > > > > The U.S. patent office has issued several notorious patents over the > > past few years of comparable outrageousness -- the infamous Amazon > "one > > click ordering" patent comes to mind, as well as the one in the > > pre-Internet early 90s that gave Compton's a patent on the very > concept > > of hyper-linking and multimedia. > > > > The entire set top box manufacturing industry should get behind > EchoStar > > and support their appeal. Fortunately, EchoStar has historically spent > > heavily on legal expenses (including another, unrelated current battle > > over transmission of distant signals.) > > > > But with so much of this industry now based outside the U.S., and much > > of it in Asia beyond the reach of U.S. patent law, there's also the > > distinct possibility that this will play out globally as a local > story. > > Whether TiVo really has the muscle, legal or otherwise, to create a > > worldwide monopoly on DVRs is doubtful. > > > > EchoStar says they're going back to the drawing boards to design a DVR > > disk drive system that doesn't violate TiVo's patent. Good luck to > them. > > If the patent could be interpreted as applying only to a certain > > technique for simultaneous record and playback, and not the broad > > concept, then perhaps the chilling effect on the set top box industry > > won't be so severe. But note that when TiVo was first introduced, back > > around 1997, they explained that they had designed their split-screen > > EPG specifically to work around Gemstar's patents. It hardly prevented > > Gemstar's suit. > > > > Meanwhile, there's another highly contentious technology that some > > cable-TV companies have just recently introduced which might offer a > > true alternative: network DVR service, in which the hard drives are > > located not in the customer's set top box, but in big servers at the > > cable system's head end. Just one problem with this approach: > Hollywood > > has already started filing lawsuits. > > > > DVRs are clearly a very litigious product category. Watch out. > > > > All material on this site Copyright 2006 CMP Media LLC. All rights > > reserved > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > > > > > -- > Tom Barry trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx > Now seeking new full time position as video software developer > Find my resume and video filters at www.trbarry.com > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.