Monty Solomon posted: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/how-big-cable-killed-the-open-set-top-box-and-what-to-do-about-it/ A good description of the games the MVPDs play. I especially liked the way the article describes putting the fox in charge of the henhouse. On this quote, though: --------------------------- Schultze believes that the FCC has been focusing on the wrong interface. Rather than restricting cable firms from encrypting content as it passes from the cable company to the customer's set-top box, Schultze believes cable companies should offer access to unencrypted video to devices inside the home. "The provider's set-top box (or CableCARD) could still be responsible for decrypting signals in order to prevent service theft," he wrote, "but the video signal emitted from that device could be mandated to be 'in the clear' to any device that wishes to interoperate." --------------------------- This would be pretty decent. You have a box at the point of cable entry into the house, and then from there on, all sets in the house would be seeing clearQAM. And the box could decrypt all of the channels that household signed up for. You can go much further if the cable system switches over to all IP streams, *or* if cable systems design cable boxes that convert incoming TV channels into standard IP streams. Then you can leverage the full IP suite to do any kind of EPG scheme and interactivity your hearth desires. The problem is, it makes too much good sense. MVPDs much prefer forcing people to add unnecessary rental hardware in front of each one of their TV sets, not to mention rental or in-system PVRs. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.