Again referring to Chapter 5 of the FCC broadband plan, http://download.broadband.gov/plan/national-broadband-plan-chapter-5-spectrum.pdf A repeated argument in this chapter is the "value" of the spectrum when used by different industries. Even ignoring the fact that frequencies as low as 225 MHz are hardly ideal for handheld devices (but may be good for fixed devices), that whole "value" argument has always rubbed me the wrong way. I think I've come up with an analogy that explains why. What is the "value" of the aspirin market, if we made aspirins a by-prescription-only drug? It would be far greater than what the pharmaceutical and medical industries can rake in today. Does that make a rule change for aspirin something an agency of the US Government should be advocating? Just because it would be more lucrative if doctors had to prescribe it? The FCC cannot become so single-minded as to base its decisions on which industries to prop up and which to eliminate only on THOSE INDUSTRIES' revenues. If I were the FCC, I'd be more than a little embarassed to keep repeating that argument. At least, pretend you're really concerned with a bigger picture. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.