[opendtv] Court questions FCC's broadcast flag rules

  • From: "John Shutt" <shuttj@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "OpenDTV" <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:22:28 -0500

By Declan McCullagh
URL: http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-5585533.html
WASHINGTON--A federal appeals court on Tuesday sharply questioned whether 
the Federal Communications Commission has the authority to ban certain types 
of digital TV receivers, including peripheral cards, starting in July.
Two of the three judges on the District of Columbia Circuit panel said the 
FCC never received permission from Congress to undertake such a sweeping 
regulation, which is intended to encourage the purchase of digital TV 
receivers that curb Internet distribution of over-the-air broadcasts of 
programming such as movies and sports.

"You're out there in the whole world, regulating. Are washing machines 
next?" asked Judge Harry Edwards. Quipped Judge David Sentelle: "You can't 
regulate washing machines. You can't rule the world."

In November 2003, the FCC said that every product sold in the United States 
after July 2005 that can receive digital TV broadcasts or digital TV streams 
must be able to recognize a "broadcast flag." Such products--ranging from TV 
sets to computer tuners made by Elgato Systems and Hauppauge Computer 
Works--are permitted to deliver high-quality digital output only to devices 
that also adhere to the broadcast flag specification.

The groups challenging the FCC's broadcast flag regulation include the 
American Library Association, the Association of Research Libraries, the 
Medical Library Association, Public Knowledge and the Electronic Frontier 
Foundation. They argue that the FCC exceeded its authority, that Congress 
should be responsible for making copyright law, and that librarians' ability 
to make "fair use" of digital broadcasts will be unreasonably curtailed.

But one of the judges, Sentelle, suggested that the library and other 
nonprofit groups challenging the FCC's rule would not suffer the kind of 
particular harm necessary to allow the case to proceed.

"You have to have a harm that distinguishes you from the public at large," 
Sentelle said during oral arguments. "If there is not a particularized harm, 
you do not have standing...There may be someone from the industry who can 
come forward." Edwards also said he was concerned about the groups' 
"standing," referring to the judicially recognized right to sue. Special 
rules exist for organizations suing federal agencies.

From the perspective of the entertainment industry, the broadcast flag is 
needed to encourage over-the-air distribution of valuable content. Without 
the FCC's action, the Motion Picture Association of America has argued, the 
threat of Internet piracy would imperil the future of digital TV.


-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: image/gif
-- File: dotclear.gif


 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts:

  • » [opendtv] Court questions FCC's broadcast flag rules