[openbeosstorage] Re: DiskDevice API 2.2 remarks
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 16:57:48 +0200 CEST
"Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> *sigh* My mail is completely mangled again. Tyler, I remember, Axel
> said, there would possibly be a mailing list setting=3D3F Have you had
> a
> closer look=3D3F
> ...
> Original mail edited for readability (replacing question marks is a
> bit
> of fighting wind mills, but... ;-):
Perhaps we should add an option to BeMail to repair those mails :-)
> > some more thoughts on the updated DiskDevice API.
> > ...
Sounds good to me.
> > Now, I finally know, what bothered me a bit. A partition actually
> > has
> > two types, an outer and inner type. The former one is assigned by
> > the
> > parent partition, while the latter one describes the contents. The
> > same
> > holds, of course, for the parameters. I wonder, if we should make
> > that
> > explicit in the API and have Type() and ContentType(). That way we
> > could also drop the BDiskDevice::DeviceType(). CanEditParameters(),
> > GetParameterEditor() and SetParameters() would each get a second,
> > `Content', version.
> > What do you think=3D3F
Yes, that makes sense - I would like to see this differentiation :-)
Adios...
Axel.
Other related posts:
