> Regarding the code reviews, I noticed that you listed the recent reviews > under alpha. Which is doubtlessly correct for the phase, but actually the > code is the same as in the late pre-alpha phase. > It's certainly a question of definition, but I think it would be better to > list the reviews under the phase in which the code originates. I was afraid you were going to say that. :-) I don't really matter to me, so I guess I'll just change it whenever I get around to it. -Tyler