Every time I read a post I am so grateful to have peers -true peers- to walk this new path. Gratefully yours, Cathy Bird, via iPad > On Dec 18, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Calysta Phillips <cphillips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Thank you, Darcy!!!!! You're the best!!! Just what I needed.... forging on... > Thanks to all of you for your insight, comments, encouragement, honesty... I > am honored to be a part of this community. I can feel my cells stretching. > Happy Holidays! > > >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Darcy Rogers <rogersdr25@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hello all! I have been watching the posts going around and I feel honored >> and privileged to be part of such an amazing, earnest passionate group of >> people. I don’t know if I have ever seen such a dedicated group of educators >> in my life. The questions that people are asking and the goals that you all >> have to create the best classrooms possible are not only inspiring, but >> transformative. >> >> The main topics that seem to be coming up lately all seem to revolve around >> 3 main themes: >> >> 1. Grammar use >> 2. Use of L1 >> 3. Planning (units vs textbook vs ‘progressions & threads’, etc.) >> >> I would like to challenge and encourage you all on the journey. Some of you >> may or many not have heard the story of how this came about, but for some >> reason I think it is important to know. It is very similar to Arnold’s >> experience in that after having taught traditionally for a few years, I took >> a group of students to Mexico. Their inability to function and be >> comfortable in the second language (L2) brought about a series of events >> that transformed my classroom. My goals shifted, my intent shifted and more >> than anything, my own personal learning shifted. (I believe many of you know >> this moment I’m talking about, that’s why you’re here). >> >> I was lucky enough to live in an area where there were trainings happening >> around ACTFL levels and communicative based practices. I took 2 different >> OPI trainings. I learned about Second Language Acquisition (SLA) and brain >> research about the importance of movement and student interest. I was then >> lucky enough to work at a school where the 10 Principles of CES (Coalition >> of Essential Schools) were their guiding values. This was the last piece: >> the students. The school placed a large emphasis on getting to know the >> student, personalization and best teaching practices (which includes student >> accountability, critical thinking, reflection of learning and student >> interaction). Many times, there was no transference of any of these >> principles to the language classroom. Second language often felt like the >> bastard child, since we were just dutifully trolling through the textbook. >> If you could, however, create a classroom that looked different; that >> actually resembled how language is acquired, that brought together the ACTFL >> levels, SLA, personalization, communication, building community and movement >> all at once, well wow! That has been and is the intent of OWL. It is not a >> way of telling teachers how to do something, or even creating a system of >> rules of what OWL is: it is a way of attempting to combine what we all know >> to be best practices in to one classroom. A way to establish a set of values >> that can guide our conversations. That is the journey. >> >> Since the conversation about how our classrooms could look began, there have >> been some interesting and exciting things discovered by educators in our >> community: >> >> 1. The circle. The idea of student equality, creating community and >> promoting interaction (SLA): take away the back and front of the room, put >> all students in front of each other, eliminate physical boundaries and >> encourage language production and actual face-to-face communication. >> >> 2. Movement. Students who move are more engaged (brain research). The >> beautiful thing about combining it with the circle is that it builds >> community and allows for new vocabulary to come up in an authentic way. This >> looks different at different levels. >> >> 3. Communicative focus. This meant leaving the grammar behind. To be clear, >> this does not mean an absence of grammar. Grammar is in everything we do, >> and in order to move up language levels, it must be addressed; however, it >> looks different. >> >> 4. Student as curriculum. This is the most abstract concept. The idea is not >> new: Student-centered, yes. Student-focused, yes. But this is different. >> Actually taking the student and making them the curriculum is a new step. >> This is the scariest of all because it requires stepping away from the >> textbook and stepping away from pre-prepared units and actually allowing >> students to talk about what their interests are. When truly done in a way >> that is cohesive with SLA and ACTFL, then it is fulfilling, meaningful, and >> produces results. This is the uniqueness of what we are talking about >> achieving. >> >> 5. Artistry. An environment that a teacher can create where the classroom is >> a cohesive community of students and teachers working together to achieve >> language learning. >> >> Within all of those concepts, there are embedded questions about L1 use, >> grammar, the textbook and units. I am going to be sending out a series of >> posts today addressing those issues that I hope will encourage further >> conversation and reflection within our professional development community. >> >> Thank you all for your incredible minds and hearts!!! >> >> Darcy Rogers >> Organic World Language (OWL) >> Phone: 541.601.4509 >> Fax: 541.776.4099 >> Website: www.organicworldlanguage.com >> Facebook: tinyurl.com/organic-language-facebook >