Yes thanks again for all the work. I enjoy seeing those summery tables. We
must have been missing someone at the countdown to have gone from 110 to 116.
I suspect it was the north umpqua group as I do not remember those goldeneyes
at the countdown. It was nice to see that those were found again. I remember
Ron finding those pretty consistently for a number of years, but it seems like
they have been hard to find the last few years. If the countdown number holds
for the Reedsport countdown the 116 would mean the inland Douglas county count
beat the 114 Coastal Douglas county count. This is a big surprise to me. I
would credit it to the difference in the quantity of counters. I think there
were in the mid 30’s for Roseburg participants and less than 15 for Reedsport.
Thanks again,
Keith
Sent from my iPod
On Dec 31, 2017, at 10:28 PM, Mikeal Jones
<mikealjones@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mikealjones@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
As much fun as it is recording birds in our own parts of the Count Circle, your
organization (Mark), tally (Jeannie) and narrative on Umpqua Birds (Matt) tie
it all together to enjoy and compare with other years. Thanks to each of you
for making the Christmas Bird Count for Roseburg-Sutherlin such a great time.
Mikeal
Mikeal Jones
826 SE Brockway Ave
Roseburg OR 97470
(541) 673-1859
mikealjones@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mikealjones@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent from our iPad 2
On Dec 31, 2017, at 11:42 AM, Matthew G Hunter
<matthewghunter@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:matthewghunter@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi Folks,
Please find a summary of the Roseburg-Sutherlin CBC here:
http://umpquabirds.blogspot.com/2017/12/roseburg-sutherlin-christmas-bird-count.html
If you participated in the count, please review the data tables linked here (or
at www.umpquabirds.org/cbc<http://www.umpquabirds.org/cbc>) and let me know if
you see any errors. Thank-you!
Good Birding,
Matt Hunter
P.S. One of the most interesting things to me is to look at the tables I have
been producing several years now, which sort the bird numbers not only by
taxonomy, but by total numbers of each species and by the number of team areas
recording the species. For example, can you predict which species were found in
all 14 team areas? It's also interesting to see which species were found in
only one team area (e.g. easily missed). Look for these tables in the blog and
cbc websites linked above. mgh
