Consider me just as cantankerous!
Marcia F. Cutler
Corvallis
On Jan 16, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Robert O'Brien <baro@xxxxxxx> wrote:
For me the present system of a single photo is perfect. After all it's woth
a thousand words. I don't object necessarily to more than one but several or
more can go elsewhere.
I do refuse to join facebook especially and any site which requires
registration to view photos. So those photos pass me by. But thats just
cantankerousness.
Bob obrien
On Monday, January 16, 2017, Treesa Hertzel <Autumn207@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OBOL
For many years, OBOL prohibited attachments to posts out of courtesy to our
rural members who did not have fast internet and for whom large attachments
may clog or crash their system.
A year ago, we cautiously changed that policy to allow one attachment per
post. One. If you want to showcase your photos, best practice is for you to
upload them somewhere else, i.e. Flickr, Picasa, your own website, etc.,
and send a post to OBOL, linking to them.
This is a good time for me to ask for your feedback on how the
one-attachment-permitted policy has affected you, especially if you have
slow internet or other connection or ISP problems due to your location. We
all love photos, and if absolutely no one has any problems any more, we
could look at changing the policy to allow more attachments. Please let me
know if or how your system has been affected by attachments to OBOL posts.
Thank you.
Treesa Hertzel
OBOL Moderator
autumn207@xxxxxxxxxxx
