Now that I've reread my hasty post, I should have begun with "I agree with
both Alan and Lars".
May God help me :-)
Jack Williamson
West Linn, Oregon
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Jack Williamson <
jack.williamson.jr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I agree with Lars (I think) -
CBC's will never be proven wrong, and they will continue for the sheer fun
of (it).
Their contribution to science will persist, in the long-term, so long as
they provide relevant context for future generations of hybrid historian x
data collectors.
Jack Williamson
West Linn, Oregon
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Lars Per Norgren <
larspernorgren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Come on Alan! No one, the Almighty himself included, is going to
get one bite of Anne Heyerly's rum cake on E-bird. To confute CBCs with
pure data collection is analogous to saying human sexuality is strictly
about procreation. Lars
OBOL archives: www.freelists.org/archive/obol
Manage your account or unsubscribe: //www.freelists.org/list/obol
Contact moderators: obol-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
