Dave L. wrote: > Craig suggests Boreal Owls are "relatively rare". (1) Are they really? > (2) Or is it that they occupy a habitat that is difficult to access > ... and they sing when their habitat is usually inaccessible to most > people? The answers are (1) maybe and (2) maybe. I took out the "secretive" bit from Dave's phrasing of the second question because, from elsewhere in their range, there is no indication that Boreal/Tengmalm's Owls are especially more secretive than other small owls, though they are nocturnal, and here in Oregon, their range appears to be mainly in mountainous areas where few people live or spend much time after dark in the nesting season. One reason why I suggested the idea of people visiting Boreal Owl habitat is that this winter/spring seems like an unusually good opportunity to address these two questions. As some of their potential habitat is much more accessible this year than in most years, we could learn a lot by going out and listening. Pick a stretch of road or trail, get out there after it's fully dark, and stop to listen every half mile. Here's an example of a protocol that has been recommended in British Columbia: http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hts/risc/pubs/tebiodiv/owl/owl_protocols_2k6.pdf See p. 17 for the part on Boreal Owls. Then, let me suggest that you report your results -- whether positive or negative -- to someone who will make sure they get recorded so that 10 years from now, we won't be arguing about the same exact questions. Maybe some agency such as the US Forest Service already has a jump on surveying for Boreal Owls on the lands that they manage, where there is suitable habitat. If so, it would be good to hear from someone involved as to whether volunteer birders could significantly extend the reach of the surveys. Good birding, Joel -- Joel Geier Camp Adair area north of Corvallis OBOL archives: www.freelists.org/archive/obol Manage your account or unsubscribe: //www.freelists.org/list/obol Contact moderators: obol-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx