Russia, China warily watch for American intrusion in Central Asia
- From: "Muslim News" <editor_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Muslim News" <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 12:09:15 +0100
As small Central Asian countries have struck military alliances with the United
States, their leaders have asserted their own power more aggressively. At the
same time, the presence of American soldiers threatens to dilute Russia’s and
China’s power to influence the region’s politics and economics. Since September
2001, Russia and China have cooperated with Washington’s moves and generally
affirmed its aims. But as the fighting in Afghanistan winds down, hard-liners
in both countries are expressing resentment and apprehension about a prolonged
American presence in a region they consider their backyard.
Where elites from smaller Central Asian states revolted after their leaders
gripped power more tightly bureaucrats in Russia are pressuring President
Vladimir Putin to resist American maneuvers that would make the United States a
fixture in the region. As six American F-18 jets arrived in Kyrgyzstan on April
20, Russia’s Duma disavowed a promised rescheduling of Kyrgyzstan’s $133
million debt to Moscow. President Askar Akayev was forced to strongly deny
speculation that American bases could "conflict with Russian interests" or
start "limiting [Russia’s] influence in the region or pushing Russia out
altogether."
To this point, Moscow and Washington are officially partners in the
antiterrorism coalition. For China, whose relations with the Bush
administration have been rough, the presence of American soldiers is more
ominous. Soldiers in Bishkek are only 200 miles from the Chinese border, and
Chinese officials vocally worry about mischief. "Beijing’s policy is against
strategies of force and the US military presence in Central Asia," President
Jiang Zemin said on April 21 while visiting Tehran.
China does not fear an invasion so much as a costly, time consuming struggle
for control of the region’s natural and capital resources. American silence on
its long-range plan feeds those fears. Says a European ambassador in Kabul:
"The danger of a new Great Game in Central Asia between the US, Russia and
China is very real unless the Americans spell out their intentions."
Putin has already put down Russia’s marker. As Russia tries to boost its own
oil production and sale, the president has warned Americans that he will not
refrain from working without their cooperation. In a January 21 meeting with
Turkmen President Saparmyrat Niyazov, Putin raised the idea of creating "a
Eurasian alliance of gas producers." While Putin did not address the transport
of oil, this idea endangers American efforts to guide the construction of an
enormous pipeline from the Azerbaijani capital of Baku through the Georgian
capital of Tbilisi to Ceyhan on Turkey’s Mediterranean coast.
The pipeline, if it comes together, would carry Kazakh oil and oil from other
former Soviet states but would bypass Russia and Iran, denying those countries
shipping and construction revenue. While machinations surrounding that pipeline
continue, Chinese interests have invested as much as $6 billion in Kazakhstan’s
oilfields, for potential pipeline delivery into China.
Whatever these games cost, they could end in shame unless Central Asia becomes
a stable place to work and live. Without democratic reforms and with corruption
rampant, all Central Asian economies suffer from high unemployment, poor public
health and flimsy public education. The United Nations estimates that 70-80
percent of the populations of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan lives below the poverty
level. In parts of Kyrgyzstan, one hears of people eating rats and dogs. Such
conditions prevent people from organizing to effectively demand reform.
Fundamentalism grows in response to the same factors that drove Turkmenistan’s
Boris Shikhmuradov and other elites into exile: suppression of secular
democratic political parties, tight state control over local media and
multiple, persistent corruption scandals. While nobody expects an Islamic
revolt like the one that changed Iran in 1979, some elites have concluded that
– in the shadow of American, Chinese and Russian intrigue – their leaders are
unwilling or incompetent to reform their political systems. "All the regimes
have escalating political problems and we don’t know if it will take one year
or three years to see major changes," says a political analyst in Washington.
As heads of state have stalled, international organizations have stepped in
with their own agendas – potentially further reducing Chinese and Russian
influence. The World Bank plans to loan $1.5 billion in the region over the
next decade; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development has announced
plans to lend $300 million this year.
They will bring political influence with their money. "Since September 11, a
lot of our shareholders discerned the importance of this region, and we are
going to take advantage of that to wield a cohesive policy," World Bank
President James Wolfensohn told reporters in Almaty on April 9. Central Asian
presidents may not hear a warning in Wolfensohn’s talk of "cohesive policy." At
the same conference where Wolfensohn spoke, Kazakhstani political advisor
Ermukhamet Ertysbaev gave his boss license to continue deferring elections.
"Foreign investors don’t care where they are investing money, be it in a
dictatorship or democracy," he said.
As long as American policy in the region emphasizes troops over reform, some
fear this calculation may be right. "The Americans make statements that don’t
tie them down to anything and which are ignored by the Central Asian regimes,"
says Emil Aliev, leader of Kyrgyzstan’s opposition Ar-Namys party.
Even if the United States has refrained from sternly demanding reform, some
observers say, its presence is making some leaders act so outrageous that the
opposition is growing more vocal. If that continues to happen, Washington may
have to decide whether to cast its lot with largely discredited rulers or work
to promote messy transitions to democracy. The dilemma grows murkier when one
realizes that many of the new opposition leaders have been timeservers in the
regimes they now criticize and many are also engulfed in corruption scandals.
As opposition forces coalesce, Russia and China will also have to make
long-range decisions about how and when to intervene. So far neither Russia nor
the United States is openly supporting the Turkmen opposition. Uzbek President
Islam Karimov signed a treaty on March 13 that gives Washington something of an
out. While the United States pledges to "regard with grave concern any external
threat to Uzbekistan," it also obligates Karimov "to intensify the democratic
transformation of [Uzbek] society politically and economically." Meanwhile,
China and Russia are nervously watching to see if that transformation pits them
against the United States or throws the region into chaos.
Source: EURASIA
============================================================
You can choose whether you prefer to receive regular emails or a weekly digest
by visiting http://www.muslim-news.net
Archive: http://archive.muslim-news.net
You can subscribe by sending an email to request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
"subscribe" (without quotes) in the subject line, or by visiting
http://www.muslim-news.net
You can unsubscribe by sending an email to request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the
word "unsubscribe" (without quotes) in the subject line, or by visiting
http://www.muslim-news.net
You are welcome to submit any relevant news story to submit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For regular Islamic cultural articles by email, send email to
revivalist-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
============================================================
Other related posts:
- » Russia, China warily watch for American intrusion in Central Asia
