Bush urges big powers to help oust Saddam; Putin, Chirac, Jiang question pre-emptive military strike; Congress approval of use of force runs into roadblock WASHINGTON: As many as 100 US and British aircraft, including the dozen that dropped precision bombs, raided a command and control centre in western Iraq, The Daily Telegraph of London said. The paper described it as the biggest ever raid in four years. It said that the aim seemed to be the removal of air defences to allow easy access for special forces helicopters to fly into Iraq via Jordan or Saudi Arabia to hunt down Scud missiles before a possible war. A Pentagon spokesman initially denied the report, saying that the numbers of aircraft cited in the story were wrong. A dozen US and British warplanes bombed a "critical command and control node" in western Iraq in a raid that was larger than usual but not out of the ordinary, the Pentagon said on Friday. "Was it bigger than most? It was bigger than the ones we'd done in the last probably two weeks, but we've done strikes of that size several times over the last 10 or 11 years," Brigadier General John Rosa, Deputy Operations Director of the Joint Staff, said of Thursday's strike. Rosa confirmed, however, that 12 aircraft dropped 25 bombs on the target, which was located at a military airfield 380 kilometres west of and slightly south of Baghdad. He said he thought the Telegraph's estimate of 100 aircraft in the air was high. He also acknowledged that the strike was unusual in that it was directed at an air defence site in western Iraq, whereas most previous strikes have been in the southeastern part of the country. But he said the site was attacked because coalition aircraft had come under fire while patrolling the no fly zone. "When you look and see how they tie that system in, that's a critical node in triangulating and looking and measuring where our airplanes are. So if you take that node out, it makes it more difficult to track your airplanes," he said. The strike was the 25th in southern Iraq this year by US and British aircraft, enforcing a no-fly zone, Rosa said. Another 10 air strikes have been carried out in the north. The tempo of air strikes subsided during last year's war in Afghanistan, but picked up again this year. And in Baghdad, an Iraq military spokesman confirmed that US and British warplanes bombed targets in western Iraq on Thursday, the first in that area in four years. Meanwhile, US President George W Bush on Friday attempted to persuade France, Russia and China to back his goal of ousting Iraqi President Saddam Hussein as he laid the groundwork for a UN speech next week. Bush called French President Jacques Chirac, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Jiang Zemin, who all have questioned any pre-emptive military strike on Iraq. Each call lasted about 10 minutes, officials said. Putin earlier expressed deep reservations about military force against Iraq, and Chirac told Bush the UN Security Council should decide what action to take if Baghdad rejected the return of UN weapons inspectors. The White House said it would dispatch envoys to Paris, Moscow and Beijing to consult after Bush's address to the United Nations on September 12. The three nations, along with the US and Britain, form the permanent members of the UN Security Council. "The president told the foreign leaders that he values their opinions. He stressed that Saddam Hussein is a threat and that we needed to work together to make the world more peaceful," said White House spokesman Ari Fleischer. Fleischer said Bush told them no decision had been made about what the next step would be. He added all three had "expressed an openness to listen" to Bush and his ideas and none had rejected outright what he had to say. A White House official said the calls were the beginning of a process of consulting with friends and allies "on how to remove the threat posed by Saddam Hussein and his relentless acquisition of weapons of mass destruction". The Kremlin said President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair had called Putin within minutes of each other and said that Putin said no to both of them. Putin underlined the potential for a political solution to the Iraqi problem and expressed "deep doubts about the justification of the use of force against Iraq", top Kremlin spokesman Alexei Gromov said. He told Blair the use of force could have "serious, negative consequences for the situation in the Gulf region, the Middle East and for the future of the US-led anti-terrorism coalition", the Kremlin said. In Paris, Chirac spokeswoman Catherine Colonna said the French president told Bush that Iraq had to submit to outside controls and the international community must be firm in demanding this. "If Iraq continues to refuse the unconditional return of the inspectors, it is up to the Security Council to take appropriate measures," she quoted him as saying. The US spokesman, who called the response from the three leaders appreciative, said US envoys would be dispatched to each of the other four Security Council capitals for continued consultations about Iraq after Bush addressed the UN on September 12. But he added "the president said that no decision had been made about what the next step would be". "No matter what decision the president may or may not make in the future, the president will continue to talk to these leaders because they play an important role," Fleischer said. Bush is to meet Blair on Saturday at his Camp David, Maryland, presidential retreat. Iraq is also likely to be the subject of talks on Monday between Bush and Canada's Jean Chretien, who refused on Thursday to say whether he would endorse military action against Iraq while noting that Washington has yet to produce evidence that Iraq was building an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's top representative to the UN maintained that his country had no weapons of mass destruction, calling any potential US invasion a breach of international law. In remarks to NBC television, UN ambassador Mohammad al-Duri insisted "we have no such weapons at all", and warned that any war would be a major challenge for the US. At home, Bush's hopes for getting Congress to approve a resolution backing the use of force against Iraq if he decides it is necessary ran into a potential roadblock, when the Senate leader said the Senate may not vote on it before adjourning next month for November mid-term elections. "We have to make the right decision ... it may be before the (November congressional) election, it may be after," Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota told CNN. Fleischer said since it appeared the House of Representatives would take a vote before the adjourning, "It's just hard to imagine that somebody would say we should wait until next year." Bush is facing demands from some members of Congress for more evidence laying out the imminent threat he says Saddam poses. There is much speculation that Bush will call for an ultimatum for Iraq to allow UN weapons inspectors unfettered weapons inspections or face military attack. Bolstering Bush's argument of an imminent threat, UN experts studying satellite photos of Iraq have identified new construction at several sites linked in the past to Baghdad's development of nuclear weapons. They said they could draw no conclusion on the significance, but the White House called the report "deeply, deeply troubling". Source: The News ============================================================ You can choose whether you prefer to receive regular emails or a weekly digest by visiting http://www.muslim-news.net Archive: http://archive.muslim-news.net You can subscribe by sending an email to request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "subscribe" (without quotes) in the subject line, or by visiting http://www.muslim-news.net You can unsubscribe by sending an email to request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" (without quotes) in the subject line, or by visiting http://www.muslim-news.net You are welcome to submit any relevant news story to submit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For regular Islamic cultural articles by email, send email to revivalist-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ============================================================