. . BOOKS: ELECTRONIC :BUSINESS: CORPORATIONS: NAMED CORPORATIONS: GOOGLE : LAW: CASE: DECISIONS :
INTERNET: SEARCH: TOOLS: Google Books Settlement Rejected . .Google Books Settlement Rejected The company's plan to resolve copyright claims arising from its book scanning project will need to be revised.
By Thomas Claburn Information Week March 23, 2011 05:34 PMhttp://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/google/ showArticle.jhtml?articleID=229400184&cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All
. A shorter URL for the above link: . http://tinyurl.com/4sqsqwc . .Google on Tuesday suffered a significant setback in its mission to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible.
.Federal appeals court judge Denny Chin ruled that Google's proposed settlement of copyright claims arising from the company's digitization of books and presentation of excerpts online isn't fair.
."While the digitization of books and the creation of a universal digital library would benefit many, the ASA [Amended Settlement Agreement] would simply go too far," the judge wrote in his ruling. "...Indeed, the ASA would give Google a significant advantage over competitors, rewarding it for engaging in wholesale copying of copyrighted works without permission, while releasing claims well beyond those presented in the case."
.The judge suggested that many of his objections would be resolved were the settlement converted from "opt-out" to "opt-in."
. . . culture Explaining the Google Books Case SagaBy Jerry Brito March 23, 2011 Time
Techlandhttp://techland.time.com/2011/03/23/ explaining-the-google-books-case-saga/
A shorter URL for the above link: http://tinyurl.com/4v4qtq4 Origins of the Google Books Case .This is the latest twist in a six-year legal saga that began when Google announced in 2004 that it was partnering with several research universities around the world to scan their entire library collections. Google would then make the digitized copies available for search online. To date Google has scanned over 12 million books.
.Scanning a book means copying it, and copying a book without permission from the publisher or author is a violation of copyright. Soon after the announcement, publisher and author groups began protesting Google's ambitious plan as a violation of their rights. If Google was going to use their works, they wanted to be asked for permissionand they wanted a cut of any profits.
.Google maintained that scanning the books was fair use. While all books would be indexed and searchable on the Google Books site, users would only be able to access the full text of books that were out of copyright and in the public domain. If a book was still under copyright, and its rights-holder had not given permission, then a search would only return a small snippet of text, not the whole book or even a page.
.In mid-2005, the Author's Guild and the American Association of Publishers filed suit to stop Google from scanning any more books. Soon the Author's Guild's case was certified as a class-action lawsuit, meaning that anyone who had ever published a bookmillions of authorswould be part of the class represented and would be bound by the result of the case.
. Additional Topics Covered in this Article: An Unsettling Settlement Saving the Orphans What's Next . . . Judge Rejects Google Book Deal Over Monopoly ConcernsThe search giant wanted to let users search the full text of any book scanned and digitally tucked away in its online database.
By Matt Peckham, Technologizer March 23, 2011 10:29 am PC Worldhttp://www.pcworld.com/article/222963/ judge_rejects_google_book_deal_over_monopoly_concerns.html
. A shorter URL for the above link: . http://tinyurl.com/66d9aa6 . .It looks like Google's attempt to bury the hatchet with authors and publishers in its bid to digitize a world's worth of books may be in jeopardy after a New York federal judge on Tuesday rejected a $125 million settlement reached in October 2008.
.Google promotes that settlement on its Google Books page as "with a broad class of authors and publishers to make the world's books even more accessible online," but Judge Denny Chin was having none of it. Chin said the deal would "arguably give Google control over the search market," and that its terms went too far. Specifically: That the settlement would give Google a "de facto monopoly" on digitized content.
. snip .Google called the ruling "disappointing," no surprise, but Chin left the door open for an amended settlement by rejecting the current one "without prejudice." What's to amend? Chin wants the settlement switched to "opt in," preventing Google from using copyrighted material by default if copyright owners fail to "opt out."
.Does all of human knowledge registered as text "want to be free"? It's probably the wrong question. The right one is: Do we want a single strictly commercial entity holding the e-library door and key to every novel, history, treatise, and manual ever written, including how it's indexed, presented, and shared?
. . . Op-Ed Contributor A Digital Library Better Than Googles By ROBERT DARNTON Published: March 23, 2011 New York Times The Opinion Pages http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/24/opinion/24darnton.html . .The result was an extremely long and complicated document known as the Amended Settlement Agreement that simply divided up the pie. Google would sell access to its digitized database, and it would share the profits with the plaintiffs, who would now become its partners. The company would take 37 percent; the authors would get 63 percent. That solution amounted to changing copyright by means of a private lawsuit, and it gave Google legal protection that would be denied to its competitors. This was what Judge Chin found most objectionable.
.In court hearings in February 2010, several people argued that the Authors Guild, which has 8,000 members, did not represent them or the many writers who had published books during the last decades. Some said they preferred to make their works available under different conditions; some even wanted to make their work available free of charge. Yet the settlement set terms for all authors, unless they specifically notified Google that they were opting out.
. snip .A number of countries are also determined to out-Google Google by scanning the entire contents of their national libraries.
. snip .Perhaps Google itself could be enlisted to the cause of the digital public library. It has scanned about 15 million books; two million of that total are in the public domain and could be turned over to the library as the foundation of its collection. The company would lose nothing by this generosity, and might win admiration for its good deed.
.Through technological wizardry and sheer audacity, Google has shown how we can transform the intellectual riches of our libraries, books lying inert and underused on shelves. But only a digital public library will provide readers with what they require to face the challenges of the 21st century a vast collection of resources that can be tapped, free of charge, by anyone, anywhere, at any time.
. . . The complete articles may be read at the URLs provided for each. . WEBBIB1011 . Sincerely, David Dillard Temple University (215) 204 - 4584 jwne@xxxxxxxxxx http://daviddillard.businesscard2.com Net-Gold http://groups.yahoo.com/group/net-gold http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/net-gold.html Index: http://tinyurl.com/myxb4w http://groups.google.com/group/net-gold?hl=en General Internet & Print Resources http://guides.temple.edu/general-internet COUNTRIES http://guides.temple.edu/general-country-info EMPLOYMENT http://guides.temple.edu/EMPLOYMENT TOURISM http://guides.temple.edu/tourism DISABILITIES http://guides.temple.edu/DISABILITIES INDOOR GARDENING http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/IndoorGardeningUrban/ Educator-Gold http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Educator-Gold/ K12ADMINLIFE http://groups.yahoo.com/group/K12AdminLIFE/ The Russell Conwell Learning Center Research Guide: THE COLLEGE LEARNING CENTER http://tinyurl.com/yae7w79 Nina Dillard's Photographs on Net-Gold http://tinyurl.com/36qd2o and also http://gallery.me.com/neemers1 http://www.flickr.com/photos/neemers/ Twitter: davidpdillard Bushell, R. & Sheldon, P. (eds), Wellness and Tourism: Mind, Body, Spirit, Place, New York: Cognizant Communication Books. Wellness Tourism: Bibliographic and Webliographic Essay David P. Dillard http://tinyurl.com/p63whl http://tinyurl.com/ou53aw INDOOR GARDENING Improve Your Chances for Indoor Gardening Success http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/IndoorGardeningUrban/ http://groups.google.com/group/indoor-gardening-and-urban-gardening SPORT-MED https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/sport-med.html http://groups.google.com/group/sport-med http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sports-med/ http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/sport-med.html HEALTH DIET FITNESS RECREATION SPORTS TOURISM http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/healthrecsport/ http://groups.google.com/group/healthrecsport http://healthrecsport.jiglu.com/ http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/health-recreation-sports-tourism.html . . Please Ignore All Links to JIGLU in search results for Net-Gold and related lists. The Net-Gold relationship with JIGLU has been terminated by JIGLU and these are dead links. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Net-Gold/message/30664 http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/healthrecsport/message/145 . .