[net-gold] BOOKS: ELECTRONIC : BUSINESS: CORPORATIONS: NAMED CORPORATIONS: GOOGLE : LAW: CASE: DECISIONS : INTERNET: SEARCH: TOOLS: Google Books Settlement Rejected

  • From: "David P. Dillard" <jwne@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Net-Gold -- Educator Gold <Educator-Gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Educator Gold <Educator-Gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, net-gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Net-Gold <Net-Gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, NetGold <netgold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Net-Gold <net-gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, K-12ADMINLIFE <K12ADMIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, K12AdminLIFE <K12AdminLIFE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, MediaMentor <mediamentor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Digital Divide Diversity MLS <mls-digitaldivide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, NetGold <netgold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Net-Platinum <net-platinum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sean Grigsby <myarchives1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Net-Gold <NetGold_general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Temple Gold Discussion Group <TEMPLE-GOLD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Temple University Net-Gold Archive <net-gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Health Lists -- Health Diet Fitness Recreation Sports Tourism <healthrecsport@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Health Diet Fitness Recreation Sports <healthrecsport@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, HEALTH-RECREATION-SPORTS-TOURISM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:08:06 -0400 (EDT)



.

.

BOOKS: ELECTRONIC :
BUSINESS: CORPORATIONS: NAMED CORPORATIONS: GOOGLE : LAW: CASE: DECISIONS :
INTERNET: SEARCH: TOOLS:
Google Books Settlement Rejected

.

.

Google Books Settlement Rejected The company's plan to resolve copyright claims arising from its book scanning project will need to be revised.
By Thomas Claburn
Information Week
March 23, 2011 05:34 PM
http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/google/ showArticle.jhtml?articleID=229400184&cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All

.

A shorter URL for the above link:

.

http://tinyurl.com/4sqsqwc

.

.

Google on Tuesday suffered a significant setback in its mission to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible.

.

Federal appeals court judge Denny Chin ruled that Google's proposed settlement of copyright claims arising from the company's digitization of books and presentation of excerpts online isn't fair.

.

"While the digitization of books and the creation of a universal digital library would benefit many, the ASA [Amended Settlement Agreement] would simply go too far," the judge wrote in his ruling. "...Indeed, the ASA would give Google a significant advantage over competitors, rewarding it for engaging in wholesale copying of copyrighted works without permission, while releasing claims well beyond those presented in the case."

.

The judge suggested that many of his objections would be resolved were the settlement converted from "opt-out" to "opt-in."

.

.

.

culture
Explaining the Google Books Case Saga
By Jerry Brito March 23, 2011 Time
Techland
http://techland.time.com/2011/03/23/ explaining-the-google-books-case-saga/



A shorter URL for the above link:



http://tinyurl.com/4v4qtq4



Origins of the Google Books Case

.

This is the latest twist in a six-year legal saga that began when Google announced in 2004 that it was partnering with several research universities around the world to scan their entire library collections. Google would then make the digitized copies available for search online. To date Google has scanned over 12 million books.

.

Scanning a book means copying it, and copying a book without permission from the publisher or author is a violation of copyright. Soon after the announcement, publisher and author groups began protesting Google's ambitious plan as a violation of their rights. If Google was going to use their works, they wanted to be asked for permissionand they wanted a cut of any profits.

.

Google maintained that scanning the books was fair use. While all books would be indexed and searchable on the Google Books site, users would only be able to access the full text of books that were out of copyright and in the public domain. If a book was still under copyright, and its rights-holder had not given permission, then a search would only return a small snippet of text, not the whole book or even a page.

.

In mid-2005, the Author's Guild and the American Association of Publishers filed suit to stop Google from scanning any more books. Soon the Author's Guild's case was certified as a class-action lawsuit, meaning that anyone who had ever published a bookmillions of authorswould be part of the class represented and would be bound by the result of the case.

.

Additional Topics Covered in this Article:

An Unsettling Settlement

Saving the Orphans

What's Next


.

.

.

Judge Rejects Google Book Deal Over Monopoly Concerns
The search giant wanted to let users search the full text of any book scanned and digitally tucked away in its online database.
By Matt Peckham,
Technologizer
March 23, 2011 10:29 am
PC World
http://www.pcworld.com/article/222963/ judge_rejects_google_book_deal_over_monopoly_concerns.html

.

A shorter URL for the above link:

.

http://tinyurl.com/66d9aa6

.

.

It looks like Google's attempt to bury the hatchet with authors and publishers in its bid to digitize a world's worth of books may be in jeopardy after a New York federal judge on Tuesday rejected a $125 million settlement reached in October 2008.

.

Google promotes that settlement on its Google Books page as "with a broad class of authors and publishers to make the world's books even more accessible online," but Judge Denny Chin was having none of it. Chin said the deal would "arguably give Google control over the search market," and that its terms went too far. Specifically: That the settlement would give Google a "de facto monopoly" on digitized content.

.

snip

.

Google called the ruling "disappointing," no surprise, but Chin left the door open for an amended settlement by rejecting the current one "without prejudice." What's to amend? Chin wants the settlement switched to "opt in," preventing Google from using copyrighted material by default if copyright owners fail to "opt out."

.

Does all of human knowledge registered as text "want to be free"? It's probably the wrong question. The right one is: Do we want a single strictly commercial entity holding the e-library door and key to every novel, history, treatise, and manual ever written, including how it's indexed, presented, and shared?

.

.

.

Op-Ed Contributor
A Digital Library Better Than Googles
By ROBERT DARNTON
Published: March 23, 2011
New York Times
The Opinion Pages
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/24/opinion/24darnton.html

.

.

The result was an extremely long and complicated document known as the Amended Settlement Agreement that simply divided up the pie. Google would sell access to its digitized database, and it would share the profits with the plaintiffs, who would now become its partners. The company would take 37 percent; the authors would get 63 percent. That solution amounted to changing copyright by means of a private lawsuit, and it gave Google legal protection that would be denied to its competitors. This was what Judge Chin found most objectionable.

.

In court hearings in February 2010, several people argued that the Authors Guild, which has 8,000 members, did not represent them or the many writers who had published books during the last decades. Some said they preferred to make their works available under different conditions; some even wanted to make their work available free of charge. Yet the settlement set terms for all authors, unless they specifically notified Google that they were opting out.

.

snip

.

A number of countries are also determined to out-Google Google by scanning the entire contents of their national libraries.

.

snip

.

Perhaps Google itself could be enlisted to the cause of the digital public library. It has scanned about 15 million books; two million of that total are in the public domain and could be turned over to the library as the foundation of its collection. The company would lose nothing by this generosity, and might win admiration for its good deed.

.

Through technological wizardry and sheer audacity, Google has shown how we can transform the intellectual riches of our libraries, books lying inert and underused on shelves. But only a digital public library will provide readers with what they require to face the challenges of the 21st century a vast collection of resources that can be tapped, free of charge, by anyone, anywhere, at any time.

.

.

.

The complete articles may be read at the URLs provided for each.

.


WEBBIB1011

.

Sincerely,
David Dillard
Temple University
(215) 204 - 4584
jwne@xxxxxxxxxx
http://daviddillard.businesscard2.com

Net-Gold
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/net-gold
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/net-gold.html
Index: http://tinyurl.com/myxb4w
http://groups.google.com/group/net-gold?hl=en


General Internet & Print Resources
http://guides.temple.edu/general-internet
COUNTRIES
http://guides.temple.edu/general-country-info
EMPLOYMENT
http://guides.temple.edu/EMPLOYMENT
TOURISM
http://guides.temple.edu/tourism
DISABILITIES
http://guides.temple.edu/DISABILITIES
INDOOR GARDENING
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/IndoorGardeningUrban/
Educator-Gold
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Educator-Gold/
K12ADMINLIFE
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/K12AdminLIFE/
The Russell Conwell Learning Center Research Guide:
THE COLLEGE LEARNING CENTER
http://tinyurl.com/yae7w79

Nina Dillard's Photographs on Net-Gold
http://tinyurl.com/36qd2o
and also http://gallery.me.com/neemers1
http://www.flickr.com/photos/neemers/
Twitter: davidpdillard


Bushell, R. & Sheldon, P. (eds),
Wellness and Tourism: Mind, Body, Spirit,
Place, New York: Cognizant Communication Books.
Wellness Tourism: Bibliographic and Webliographic Essay
David P. Dillard
http://tinyurl.com/p63whl
http://tinyurl.com/ou53aw


INDOOR GARDENING
Improve Your Chances for Indoor Gardening Success
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/IndoorGardeningUrban/
http://groups.google.com/group/indoor-gardening-and-urban-gardening


SPORT-MED
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/sport-med.html
http://groups.google.com/group/sport-med
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sports-med/
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/sport-med.html


HEALTH DIET FITNESS RECREATION SPORTS TOURISM
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/healthrecsport/
http://groups.google.com/group/healthrecsport
http://healthrecsport.jiglu.com/
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/health-recreation-sports-tourism.html

.

.


Please Ignore All Links to JIGLU
in search results for Net-Gold and related lists.
The Net-Gold relationship with JIGLU has
been terminated by JIGLU and these are dead links.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Net-Gold/message/30664
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/healthrecsport/message/145

.

.




Other related posts:

  • » [net-gold] BOOKS: ELECTRONIC : BUSINESS: CORPORATIONS: NAMED CORPORATIONS: GOOGLE : LAW: CASE: DECISIONS : INTERNET: SEARCH: TOOLS: Google Books Settlement Rejected - David P. Dillard