[ncsc-moths] Re: Acronicta
- From: Hugh McGuinness <hdmcguinness@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:04:03 -0400
Ken, Bob et al.,
I considered increta for 8, 12 & 14, especially because each shows the dark
tirangular patch in the anal angle, but ultimately I opted for ovata b/c of
the brown reniform and the lack of dark throughout the basal area.
Hugh
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Bob Perkins <perkybear@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Ken,
>
> Moths #8, 11, 12, and 14 may be A. increta.
>
> Bob
> -----------------
> On Sep 28, 2011, at 2:18 PM, kjchilds wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I've thrown most of my unidentified Acronicta photos into an album on
> Photobucket. I'm guessing that most will probably be hasta or ovata but I
> just can't get a grip on confidently identifying these things. I don't
> expect anyone to spend a bunch of time telling me what each one is but If
> any of you in the know has a few minutes and can look these over, I'd
> appreciate knowing which, if any, are not hasta or ovata.
>
> ------------------------
> Bob Perkins
> Woodlawn, Virginia
> Historian and General Outdoorsman
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
