[nasional_list] [ppiindia] Gali Lubang Tutup Lubang? Re: Sudah diduga - IMF’s Four steps to Damnation - Was: Re: Gaji Sri Mulyani Di Bank Dunia Masih Kalah Dengan Gaji Direktur BUMN

  • From: A Nizami <nizaminz@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: ekonomi-nasional@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ppiindia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lisi <lisi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, sabili@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, istiqlal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Indonesia Raya <indonesiaraya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 16:26:26 +0800 (SGT)

Iya.
Kebijakan IMF dan World Bank yang merupakan motor Neoliberalisme adalah 
membelenggu negara2 perahan mereka dengan sistem ekonomi "Gali Lubang Tutup 
Lubang".

Untuk membayar hutang lama, dibuat hutang baru yang lebih besar hingga hutang 
Indonesia sekarang bengkak jadi Rp 1600 trilyun. Jika bunganya 10%/tahun maka 
para kreditor seperti IMF, World Bank, dsb menikmati bunga Rp 160 trilyun/tahun 
dari Indonesia.

Itulah sebabnya mengapa mereka memelihara antek2 mereka dengan baik.

Dengan belenggu hutang, mereka buat negara2 perahan mereka menjual BUMN2 dan 
juga kekayaan alam ke perusahaan2 MNA asal AS yang jadi konco mereka.

Bahkan BI pun oleh desakan IMF dibuatkan UU BI sehingga pemerintah dan DPR 
tidak bisa mengontrol BI sebagai pencetak dan pengedar uang di Indonesia dengan 
alasan independensi BI. Justru IMF yang bisa mengontrol BI dengan dalih 
"kerjasama".

http://syiarislam.wordpress.com/2010/02/10/yahudi-kuasai-ekonomi-indonesia/

===
Belajar Islam sesuai Al Qur'an dan Hadits
http://media-islam.or.id
Milis Ekonomi Nasional: ekonomi-nasional-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Belajar Islam via SMS:
http://media-islam.or.id/2008/01/14/dakwah-syiar-islam-lewat-sms-mobile-phone


--- Pada Kam, 6/5/10, Irwan Kurniawan <irwank2k9@xxxxxxxxx> menulis:

> Dari: Irwan Kurniawan <irwank2k9@xxxxxxxxx>
> Judul: [ekonomi-nasional] Sudah diduga - IMF’s Four steps to Damnation - Was: 
> Re: Gaji Sri Mulyani Di Bank Dunia Masih Kalah Dengan Gaji Direktur BUMN
> Kepada: ekonomi-nasional@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Tanggal: Kamis, 6 Mei, 2010, 1:12 AM
> Quote:
> "..
> The IMF riot is painfully predictable. When a nation is,
> 'down and out, [the
> IMF] squeezes the last drop of blood out of them. They turn
> up the heat
> until, finally, the whole cauldron blows up,' - as when the
> IMF eliminated
> food and fuel subsidies for the poor in Indonesia in 1998.
> Indonesia
> exploded into riots.
> .."
> 
> Kehancuran ekonomi RI sudah dimulai sejak lama.. dan
> langkah ke-3 (rencana
> IMF & WB)
> terjadi pada awal reformasi..
> 
> Sekarang, (salah satu) pelayan sejati mereka naik kelas..
> dan sebagian
> rakyat RI bangga..
> Memalukan.. menjadi pelayan dari lembaga penghisap darah
> dan penghancur
> negara (yang
> di)miskin(kan).. :-(
> 
> CMIIW..
> 
> Wassalam,
> 
> Irwan.K
> 
> http://www.jubileeresearch.org/analysis/articles/IMF
> _Four_steps_Damnation.htm
> 
> Jubilee Plus publishes below a damning interview between
> Joseph Stiglitz
> ex-chief economist at the World Bank with the Observer,
> held over the
> weekend of the IMF's 2001 Spring meetings. In the interview
> he attackes the
> role of the US in stripping debtor nations of assets. He
> praised Botswana
> for defying the Bank and the Fund, and refusing a
> Structural Adjustment
> Programme.
> 
> IMF’s Four steps to Damnation
> 
> (UK) 29th April, 2001 by Gregory Palast
> 
> It was like a scene out of Le Carré: the brilliant agent
> comes in from the
> cold and, in hours of debriefing, empties his memory of
> horrors committed in
> the name of an ideology gone rotten. But this was a far
> bigger catch than
> some used-up Cold War spy.
> 
> The former apparatchik was Joseph Stiglitz, ex-chief
> economist of the World
> Bank. The new world economic order was his theory come to
> life. He was in
> Washington for the big confab of the World Bank and
> International Monetary
> Fund. But instead of chairing meetings of ministers and
> central bankers, he
> was outside the police cordons. The World Bank fired
> Stiglitz two years ago.
> He was not allowed a quiet retirement: he was
> excommunicated purely for
> expressing mild dissent from globalisation World
> Bank-style.
> 
> Here in Washington we conducted exclusive interviews with
> Stiglitz, for The
> Observer and Newsnight, about the inside workings of the
> IMF, the World
> Bank, and the bank's 51% owner, the US Treasury. And here,
> from sources
> unnamable (not Stiglitz), we obtained a cache of documents
> marked,
> 'confidential' and 'restricted'. Stiglitz helped translate
> one, a 'country
> assistance strategy'. There's an assistance strategy for
> every poorer
> nation, designed, says the World Bank, after careful
> in-country
> investigation. But according to insider Stiglitz, the
> Bank's 'investigation'
> involves little more than close inspection of five-star
> hotels. It concludes
> with a meeting with a begging finance minister, who is
> handed a
> 'restructuring agreement' pre-drafted for 'voluntary'
> signature.
> 
> Each nation's economy is analysed, says Stiglitz, then the
> Bank hands every
> minister the same four-step programme.
> 
> Step One is privatisation. Stiglitz said that rather than
> objecting to the
> sell-offs of state industries, some politicians - using the
> World Bank's
> demands to silence local critics - happily flogged their
> electricity and
> water companies. 'You could see their eyes widen' at the
> possibility of
> commissions for shaving a few billion off the sale price.
> And the US
> government knew it, charges Stiglitz, at least in the case
> of the biggest
> privatisation of all, the 1995 Russian sell-off. 'The US
> Treasury view was:
> "This was great, as we wanted Yeltsin re-elected. We DON'T
> CARE if it's a
> corrupt election." ' Stiglitz cannot simply be dismissed as
> a conspiracy
> nutter. The man was inside the game - a member of Bill
> Clinton's cabinet,
> chairman of the President's council of economic advisers.
> Most sick-making
> for Stiglitz is that the US-backed oligarchs stripped
> Russia's industrial
> assets, with the effect that national output was cut nearly
> in half.
> 
> After privatisation, Step Two is capital market
> liberalisation. In theory
> this allows investment capital to flow in and out.
> Unfortunately, as in
> Indonesia and Brazil, the money often simply flows out.
> Stiglitz calls this
> the 'hot money' cycle. Cash comes in for speculation in
> real estate and
> currency, then flees at the first whiff of trouble. A
> nation's reserves can
> drain in days. And when that happens, to seduce speculators
> into returning a
> nation's own capital funds, the IMF demands these nations
> raise interest
> rates to 30%, 50% and 80%. 'The result was predictable,'
> said Stiglitz.
> Higher interest rates demolish property values, savage
> industrial production
> and drain national treasuries.
> 
> At this point, according to Stiglitz, the IMF drags the
> gasping nation to
> Step Three: market-based pricing - a fancy term for raising
> prices on food,
> water and cooking gas. This leads, predictably, to
> Step-Three-and-a-Half:
> what Stiglitz calls 'the IMF riot'. The IMF riot is
> painfully predictable.
> When a nation is, 'down and out, [the IMF] squeezes the
> last drop of blood
> out of them. They turn up the heat until, finally, the
> whole cauldron blows
> up,' - as when the IMF eliminated food and fuel subsidies
> for the poor in
> Indonesia in 1998. Indonesia exploded into riots. There are
> other examples -
> the Bolivian riots over water prices last year and, this
> February, the riots
> in Ecuador over the rise in cooking gas prices imposed by
> the World Bank.
> You'd almost believe the riot was expected. And it is. What
> Stiglitz did not
> know is that Newsnight obtained several documents from
> inside the World
> Bank. In one, last year's Interim Country Assistance
> Strategy for Ecuador,
> the Bank several times suggests - with cold accuracy - that
> the plans could
> be expected to spark 'social unrest'. That's not
> surprising. The secret
> report notes that the plan to make the US dollar Ecuador's
> currency has
> pushed 51% of the population below the poverty line. The
> IMF riots (and by
> riots I mean peaceful demonstrations dispersed by bullets,
> tanks and tear
> gas) cause new flights of capital and government
> bankruptcies This economic
> arson has its bright side - for foreigners, who can then
> pick off remaining
> assets at fire sale prices. A pattern emerges. There are
> lots of losers but
> the clear winners seem to be the western banks and US
> Treasury.
> 
> Now we arrive at Step Four: free trade. This is free trade
> by the rules of
> the World Trade Organisation and the World Bank, which
> Stiglitz likens to
> the Opium Wars. 'That too was about "opening markets",' he
> said. As in the
> nineteenth century, Europeans and Americans today are
> kicking down barriers
> to sales in Asia, Latin American and Africa while
> barricading our own
> markets against the Third World 's agriculture. In the
> Opium Wars, the West
> used military blockades.
> 
> Today, the World Bank can order a financial blockade, which
> is just as
> effective and sometimes just as deadly. Stiglitz has two
> concerns about the
> IMF/World Bank plans. First, he says, because the plans are
> devised in
> secrecy and driven by an absolutist ideology, never open
> for discourse or
> dissent, they 'undermine democracy'. Second, they don't
> work. Under the
> guiding hand of IMF structural 'assistance' Africa's income
> dropped by 23%.
> Did any nation avoid this fate? Yes, said Stiglitz,
> Botswana. Their trick?
> 'They told the IMF to go packing.' Stiglitz proposes
> radical land reform: an
> attack on the 50% crop rents charged by the propertied
> oligarchies
> worldwide. Why didn't the World Bank and IMF follow his
> advice? 'If you
> challenge [land ownership], that would be a change in the
> power of the
> elites. That's not high on their agenda.
> 
> ' Ultimately, what drove him to put his job on the line was
> the failure of
> the banks and US Treasury to change course when confronted
> with the crises,
> failures, and suffering perpetrated by their four-step
> monetarist mambo.
> 'It's a little like the Middle Ages,' says the economist,
> 'When the patient
> died they would say well, we stopped the bloodletting too
> soon, he still had
> a little blood in him.' Maybe it's time to remove the
> bloodsuckers.
> 
> http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk
> 
> Pada 6 Mei 2010 15:02, A Nizami <nizaminz@xxxxxxxxx>
> menulis:
> 
> >
> >
> > Dengan gaji direksi yang milyaran per tahun, pantesan
> saja Bank2 banyak
> > yang bangkrut/kolaps dan harus dibail-out dengan uang
> rakyat.
> >
> > Contohnya tahun 1998 Rp 600 trilyun uang rakyat
> dikucurkan via KLBI/BLBI
> > untuk menolong Bank2 yang hancur termasuk Bank
> Mandiri.
> >
> > Jika uang itu dimasukan sebagai hutang/modal, niscaya
> bank2 yang ada
> > sekarang pada merugi.
> >
> > Tapi kalau dianggap hibah/gratisan ya pada untunglah
> karena dapat kucuran
> > rp ratusan trilyun rupiah.
> >
> > ===
> >
> > Belajar Islam sesuai Al Qur'an dan Hadits
> >
> > http://media-islam.or.id
> >
> > Milis Ekonomi Nasional: 
> > ekonomi-nasional-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<ekonomi-nasional-subscribe%40yahoogroups.com>
> >
> > Belajar Islam via SMS:
> >
> >
> > http://media-islam.or.id/2008/01/14/dakwah-syiar-islam-lewat-sms-mobile-phone
> >
> > --- Pada Kam, 6/5/10, Eko Subhan 
> > <ekosubhan@xxxxxxxxx<ekosubhan%40yahoo.com>>
> > menulis:
> >
> > Dari: Eko Subhan <ekosubhan@xxxxxxxxx
> <ekosubhan%40yahoo.com>>
> > Judul: Re: [ekonomi-nasional] Gaji Sri Mulyani Di Bank
> Dunia Masih Kalah
> > Dengan Gaji Direktur BUMN
> > Kepada: ekonomi-nasional@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<ekonomi-nasional%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Tanggal: Kamis, 6 Mei, 2010, 12:58 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > asik 250 juta, bisa dong kita aplikasi kartu kredit
> nih ke mba Sri hihihi
> >
> > Eko Subhan M
> >
> > ____________ _________ _________ __
> >
> > From: Siti Yulaekha <ini_yula@yahoo. com>
> >
> > To: ekonomi-nasional@ yahoogroups. com;
> johnoei@thinkapril. com
> >
> > Sent: Thu, May 6, 2010 2:19:32 PM
> >
> > Subject: Re: [ekonomi-nasional] Gaji Sri Mulyani Di
> Bank Dunia Masih Kalah
> > Dengan Gaji Direktur BUMN
> >
> > Menurut saya gaji bankir emg layak segitu... Kalau
> dihitung2 dgn besarnya
> > target yg dibebankan k pundak mereka....
> >
> > ~Y~U~L~A~
> >
> > Powered by YulzBerry®
> >
> > YM: ini_yula
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > From: johnoei@thinkapril. com
> >
> > Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 05:57:01
> >
> > To: <johnoei@thinkapril. com>
> >
> > Subject: [ekonomi-nasional] Gaji Sri Mulyani Di Bank
> Dunia Masih Kalah
> > Dengan Gaji Direktur
> >
> > BUMN
> >
> > http://www.KabariNe ws.com/?34882
> >
> > Menteri Keuangan SriMulyani Indrawati telah resmi
> mengajukan
> > suratpengunduran diri terkait penunjukan dirinya
> sebagai Managing Director
> > (DirekturPelaksana) Bank Dunia yang bermarkas di
> Washington DC, Amerika
> > Serikat.
> >
> > Suratpenunjukan itu ditandatangani langsung oleh
> Presiden Bank Dunia Robert
> > Zoellicktertanggal 25 April 2010 dan diterima Presiden
> Susilo Bambang
> > Yudhoyono pada 30April 2010.
> >
> > Setelah disetujui Presiden, Sri Mulyani mulai 1
> Junimendatang akan
> > menempati posisi baru di World Bank. Menteri yang
> jebolan Illinois
> > University ini akan menjadisatu dari hanya tiga
> Direktur Pelaksana yang
> > berada langsung di bawah Presiden BankDunia Robert
> Zoellick.
> >
> > Untuk itu, Sri Mulyani akan menerima gaji tahunan
> lebih dariUS$347.000 (Rp
> > 3,14 miliar) atau sekitar Rp 250 juta per bulan. Tentu
> saja gajiitu jauh
> > lebih tinggi dari yang selama ini diterima Sri Mulyani
> sebagai
> > MenteriKeuangan di Indonesia.
> >
> > Namun ternyata meski sudah sedemikian besar, gaji itu
> masih belum apa-apa
> > dibanding gajipara direktur BUMN (Badan Usaha Milik
> Negara).
> >
> > Seperti dikutip dalam laporan keuangan Bank Mandiri
> tahun 2008, gaji
> > seorangdirektur bank BUMN terbesar di Indonesiaitu,
> rata-rata mencapai Rp
> > 6,6 miliar per tahun!
> >
> > Rinciannya, seorang direktur Bank Mandiri rata-rata
> mendapatgaji Rp 300
> > juta setahun, plus ditambah bonus tahunan yang
> dianggarkan sebesar Rp36,23
> > miliar (tahun 2008) yang kemudian dibagi rata kepada
> 12 direksi.
> >
> > Maka jika ditotal, rata-rata seorang direktur Bank
> Mandiri akan memperoleh
> > Rp6,6 miliar. Itu pun belum ditambah aneka fasiltas
> kantor lainnya seperti
> > mobil dinas,dan sebagainya.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> >
> > Ingin bergabung ke milis ekonomi-nasional?
> >
> > Kirim email ke ekonomi-nasional- subscribe@
> yahoogroups. com
> >
> > http://capresindone sia.wordpress. com
> >
> > http://infoindonesi a.wordpress. comYahoo! Groups
> Links
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> Wassalam,
> 
> Irwan.K
> "Better team works could lead us to better results"
> http://irwank.blogspot.com
> skype: irwank2k2
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Ingin bergabung ke milis ekonomi-nasional?
> Kirim email ke ekonomi-nasional-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://capresindonesia.wordpress.com
> http://infoindonesia.wordpress.comYahoo!
> Groups Links
> 
> 
>     ekonomi-nasional-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 



Other related posts:

  • » [nasional_list] [ppiindia] Gali Lubang Tutup Lubang? Re: Sudah diduga - IMF’s Four steps to Damnation - Was: Re: Gaji Sri Mulyani Di Bank Dunia Masih Kalah Dengan Gaji Direktur BUMN - A Nizami