** Forum Nasional Indonesia PPI India Mailing List ** ** Untuk bergabung dg Milis Nasional kunjungi: ** Situs Milis: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/ ** ** Beasiswa dalam negeri dan luar negeri S1 S2 S3 dan post-doctoral scholarship, kunjungi http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com **http://www.thejakartapost.com/detaileditorial.asp?fileid=20060214.F01&irec=1 Freedom not to be rude truly desired by all Desi Anwar, Jakarta The Indonesian media, for all its many shortcomings, has long learned the hard way that religion is no laughing matter. Years of protracted bloody sectarian conflicts in areas where people of different religions live in close proximity have taught editors to shy away from provocative comments that might potentially create a maelstrom. It is not so much about self-censorship as self-preservation, where a badly worded sentence or a misperceived picture can contribute to the loss of innocent lives. In the same way, bloody history and potential charges of Anti-Semitism and racism have ensured that the Western media keep well away from anything potentially insulting or hurtful to the Jewish people. And to be fair, most self-respecting Western media would not and have not resorted to publishing the controversial cartoons making fun of the Prophet Mohammed. While no doubt in the future, those papers that did, will think twice before printing anything that might cause their nationals to be expelled from other countries and their goods boycotted. What then can one learn from the escalating global furor that followed the publishing of the cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed in the Danish daily? For one, that religious belief is irrational and no amount of rationalizing will make it so. The other is that the world has shrunk to a multi-ethnic schoolyard in which taunting, misunderstanding, teasing and insults can quickly turn into rowdy brawls if unchecked. Most Indonesian Muslims have not even seen the cartoons as they have not been shown in the major media, but their reaction is just as vociferous. There is indeed a clash going on, though not of civilizations, but of uncivil behavior -- between those who consider rudeness as an acceptable form of public expression on one side and the embassy and flag burning lot who think it is a legitimate form of retaliation, on the other side. Most level-headed individuals, who mind their own business, can only watch with dismay at this display of global passion getting the better of global common sense. The thing is our world is no longer the black and white world of East and West with clear social, cultural, religious, ethnic and economic boundaries that only require good fences in order to create good neighbors. Countries no longer have fences. The world is becoming a global village so to speak, where all of the above elements share the same playground. Our closest neighbors are not necessarily those that look the most like us. On the contrary, more and more of them look different, dress differently, cook different food, speak in a language that sounds like gibberish to us and practice a religion that is well beyond our comprehension. It might not be a situation that is to one's liking, but it is a fact that one has to live with and adjust accordingly if we seek peace and harmony in our existence. And this adjustment can only be made through a simple, though difficult, but profound shift in our perception that can and should increase our understanding and tolerance level. Just because we share the same space does not mean we share the same values. This is something that today's media anywhere have to consider. With the world surfing the same channels and sharing the same information highway, it is important to pay heed to some global road ethics that might not previously apply on the local level. It is true that the way the media has evolved in the democratic world is that it has practically become an inviolable institution protected by freedom of expression. As a matter of fact, for democratic countries, the sacredness of the media's freedom of expression is the closest thing to religion that no government can touch. There is absolutely no doubt that the media does enjoy a huge amount of influence in society. With one word or with one picture we can create a hero or a villain -- we can tell people what is important and what is not. People look to the media for guidance in facts, truths, values and all those elements we need to enable us to understand the world and our role in it. We can hate it, sue it for a lot of money, but woe to those who try to suppress its freedom of speech and independence of opinion. If we look beyond the media as an impersonal and sacred institution however, most of the time behind it there is only a bunch of people; some more ignorant than others and with their own personal prejudices, who happen to be working in a profession where they feel they can say anything they want to the general public; some of which they would not dare to say directly to their grandmothers. One does indeed have the right to be offensive to one's grandmother, insulting to one's friend, show contempt for one's neighbor and be an arrogant and rude individual as a whole. But the question is would one want to? And why would anybody want to do so, especially if one knows the consequences will be unpleasant for everybody? Why be willfully rude only to show that one has the freedom of expression to do so? There is no doubt that freedom of thought and of expression is something that a society must achieve and must defend. It is an ideal that the democratic world is still busy touting to their less democratic brothers as a ticket to a better life. But once a society possesses it, the challenge is how to use it for the purpose it is intended, which is to create a more just, civilized, respecting and enlightened society. This is by no means an easy task in a global society that is increasingly heterogeneous and borderless; where people, money, diseases, crimes, beliefs and sensitivities mingle and intertwine at a speed of pushing the remote control button. Freedom, after all, is a hard-won privilege, and for those entrusted as its guardian, it comes with great responsibility and need for respect. And as such it should not become a plaything in the hands of the rude, the ignorant and the intolerant, especially since the world already has more than its fair share of those types. Hence if we will not use our freedom to express love for our neighbor, then we should at least use it to rein in our bad manners. In this way Freedom of Expression will truly be desired by all. The writer is a journalist [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] *************************************************************************** Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia *************************************************************************** __________________________________________________________________________ Mohon Perhatian: 1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik) 2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari. 3. Reading only, http://dear.to/ppi 4. Satu email perhari: ppiindia-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 5. No-email/web only: ppiindia-nomail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 6. kembali menerima email: ppiindia-normal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: ppiindia-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ** Forum Nasional Indonesia PPI India Mailing List ** ** Untuk bergabung dg Milis Nasional kunjungi: ** Situs Milis: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/ ** ** Beasiswa dalam negeri dan luar negeri S1 S2 S3 dan post-doctoral scholarship, kunjungi http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com **