[nanomsg] libev comparision
- From: Peter Kümmel <syntheticpp@xxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:57:19 +0100
Googling for libev and nanamsg/zeromq mostly results in hits about
using zeromq _with_ libev. But I wonder if nanomsg could not be used
instead of libev as library which provides a message queue.
There is already the inproc transport. What is missing for
full blown message queue support? Is there a technical difference
to libev which would it make impossible to use nanomsg as
back-end for a message queue?
Would it be faster than libev? See http://libev.schmorp.de/bench.html
Thanks,
Peter
Other related posts:
