[nanomsg] Re: WebSocket transport
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 04:48:09 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 15/11/14 23:24, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Well, I’m assuming that you need to use either different TCP port
> numbers (or addresses), or use a two tier hand off, if you want to
> work with separate processes. (Imagine a gateway process that
> does the accept, a little bit of logic, and then forks the actual
> actual application, choosing to exec() the appropriate app based on
> the URI Path element.
I was rather thinking of in the terms of the gateway sending the file
descriptors to applications via AF_UNIX and SCM_RIGHTS.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUaB55AAoJENTpVjxCNN9YslcH/0PtqV5WhWnbwLzsxoH7rHZd
Ee3rfSqSjxRRtev5IXqhwTxBoerp6OztMkQQvYNZSZ1WQYR89YdKnueAYXC3NeCd
Ea/q2GDhu8en1R6dbCz1Gi8/W/XpdiZ9glj7zLbucEtwavrkFHi6NmVStlYvvmxb
DtoJW41z67rt+aN6yq+tPA7N3MrQmt5S6U9cwR56T+gro2sdJRZMcXR16PoHx47j
GeBhCEahaMKHBVc4/u68+HxKkkNuDAEVDphw0uGVhNeTOY89pA4rXTodlBccE6BN
2Cyx+iBAqctQR8g39adrBy8/edmpfEmr1NsoC69BHzEk+NH5WX+WcNUWTDSJ7Iw=
=kKUj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
