[nanomsg] Re: WebSocket Transport design considerations
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:38:53 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 16/10/14 23:36, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> I think this is a good first start. Longer term we can add real
> buffering and tie that to the rest of the protocol. But for now
> KISS.
+1
The harder option would be to add DONTWAIT option to nn_usock_recv()
to allow non-blocking recv.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUQKtmAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YHXQIAKbTX/RJZyvlXuGyVOme62S/
jhhFUlRYFvEkHDwt4vnst0JzoVF2KiwlZf4zdwsdeCor5dWZRmejMEVTW9z4bQKs
ddSo+SkJiq98TkaTQGGF7l+mxixU8Lus6rzKVyxNa3a8hIbewyGv2gZ0T5F6eqU7
m2KlXioXA0eosejPfsHstkPfMs+82nK5JNpqMPKSLGrW1Ir/WmN0gA8LraH73qYN
OxKbmGLQLFu5xgk3RF55F+f1ulE2Mysfv0TIhLqraaQ+Kqe6UyAM4x+iAK3m6fHl
zL3zhCCGSyQ07ESlsa/G/3p3tNbkJbUaBu/3iyd8sc08w25jXkK9sPi1OZE8aYA=
=TAFw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts: