[nanomsg] Re: Internet facing applications
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:55:18 +0200
On 22/08/13 15:09, Jan Dvořák wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:27:39 +0200 Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For starters I would propose following limits:
- max message size
- max number of peers
- max total size of subscriptions
Anything else you can think of?
Maximum number of subscriptions *per peer*, or otherwise it's wide open
to a trivial denial of service attack.
Right. That's on the publisher side.
Otherwise these should suffice to signal users that security is a concern.
By the way, XREP will be included, right?
nanomsg's equivalent to XREP is "nn_socket (AF_SP_RAW, NN_REP);"
Martin
Other related posts:
