[nanomsg] Re: How to bind on a random port?
- From: "xreborner (Shixi Chen)" <xreborner@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:55:38 +0800
So, if i don't know any port numbers that are available, it is impossible
to use nanomsg?
My program is to be run on a remote cluster, where no port numbers are
known to be reserved. I was using zeromq and my solution was to repeat
calling zmq_bind. I'm considering to switch to nanomsg since it looks
better (and also due to some problems in zeromq). Is there any plan to
solve this problem in the future?
Thanks.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> You cannot. Just use fixed port numbers.
>
> Martin
>
> On 14/11/14 15:41, xreborner (Shixi Chen) wrote:
> > I tried to repeat calling nn_bind on random port. However, it just
> > aborts if the port is already in use, rather than returning
> > *EADDRINUSE*. I also tried to use the latest code from github. It
> > doesn't abort, but it doesn't return an error code either. Anyway
> > to solve this problem?
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUZhUzAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YSdwH/Rl/PM//WT4aan4UDySHRtEX
> ezMo+LgR04dYckF9amSNcNLXdnt6NwUVHOvs/+IeBVhBqyoMgevc4hfB1Kb4iVxQ
> /Rrbjlq6/3IWQexfaXON3gjVNfUjTq6jsmVOaKeQa7ev0cTW9UDLb3FHgS3WsLq8
> XxKW2WEwWUPSOPTwTejXxZehSVWhcrmuwRvM3UKO+dTjLzk4jfFO5AARDnW2W+6l
> 5mI8epP2M9kS8BZ6zTUZh8BYN6OhWDDmEVvF32dnB1TXYfB8Jw1h8qN/Q8/RjQmt
> 0AbOht61n8zkYNOwtEx0bhSEnkUudGHZmoLO0C5GNswkS/t9uBJOYkHqEIapjpo=
> =dwWO
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Other related posts:
