Hi Jason, On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Jason E. Aten <j.e.aten@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I like the idea that BROADCAST could use multicast or udp. > > The 'catchup' (#3) should be entirely optional, since it will be very > inefficient if the provider of the catchup data has to go back a long ways > to catch up the new joins to have 'current data'. rsync like differencing > would be very good here for efficiency. Without #3 the protocol is just a pubsub with the limitation of one subscription per subscriber. So what's the point? -- Paul