[muscle] Re: Quiet

  • From: "david rene" <david.rene@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <muscle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:02:32 +0100

Hello James,

I use Muscle since 2001 in all projects.
All software of Carlipa (French editor of digital signage solution) use Muscle 
as basis of intercommunication from controller to the player. Thousand players 
are installed around the world such as Louis Vuiton Store, selectour, etc...
Now I have 2 companies, one is editor of new functional language named "Anubis 
language" based on Categorical mathematic theory. This language has a muscle 
library in Anubis itself for inter-communication like BeOS system.
The second company is Calexium which is manufacturer of MailFountain, an 
Internet appliance for soho. MailFountain is e-mail and e-mailing server 
programmed in Anubis, and all based messages communication are in muscle.
For me, Muscle is very reliable, small and isn't gluttonous like actual new 
protocol and transport technologies like XML and the others.
In our appliance we have only 16 Mb of memory. Muscle is very effective for 
embedded environment.



-----Message d'origine-----
De : muscle-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:muscle-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la 
part de James Mansion Envoyé : lundi 18 février 2008 08:03 À : 
muscle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Objet : [muscle] Quiet

Either its deathly quiet round here, or my mail sub isn't working.

Do many people actually use MUSCLE?  It seems very handy indeed to me.


Other related posts: