[muscle] Re: Patch for supporting NIO in Java client

  • From: "Jeremy Friesner" <jaf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: muscle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 22:32:06 PST (-0800)

> However, I don't think it's needed. Most people nowadays work with JDK
> 1.4.0 or higher, and they would be able to use the new code.

Hm, it does seem that Java 1.4.0 was released in February 2002, so maybe
that is long enough ago.  :^)  I will try your patch at work and see how it 
> Are people using MUSCLE in a web browser?

Well, I am anyway... dunno if anybody else is.

> I'm seeing a lot of time spent in the LEDataOutputStream
> class, so this patch is the start of my attempts to "make it better".
> In my first profiling comparision between the NIO and old I/O code,
> sending 1200 Messages takes 30% more time with old I/O than it does with
> nio.

Sounds good... please keep me posted on your progress.


Other related posts: