[modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] RE: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: "Jem Harrison" <Jem.Harrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:19:55 +0100
Alan,
I have been impressed by Maisies I have seen in steam. Although Atlantics
do not appeal to me, I can see why this has been such a succesful model
engineering design: LBSC's practical approach (Inspector Meticulious has to
play second fiddle to Curly Gottowork); a big boiler with plenty of steaming
capacity; a wide firebox to overcome the confines of 3½-inch mainframes and
maximise heat production; a Spartan cab that facilitates access to the
controls.
I have read the book. Maisie has to be up there with Doris as a design for
serious consideration.
Best wishes,
Jem
----- Original Message -----
From: "alan Stepney" <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 12:20 PM
Subject: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] RE: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
> If you are considering a loco of that size and scale, you might also
> consider Maisie.
> A very easy loco to build, and amazingly powerful for its size.
> Also, like the original, very easy to drive. Just shove in coal and water
> and it will keep going for ages.
> Alan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jem Harrison" <Jem.Harrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 11:00 AM
> Subject: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] RE: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
>
>
> Thanks Pendragon,
>
> Doris is near the top of my list of possibilities.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Jem
>
> MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
> modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject
> line.
>
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
Other related posts:
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] RE: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
