[mira_talk] Re: mira vs newbler
- From: Andrzej N <andrzej.k.n@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: mira_talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:57:38 -0600
I tried both MIRA and Newbler...I'm staying with MIRA :).
Highly recomended!
Andrzej
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Jose Blanca <jblanca@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> newbler --version
>
> newbler Software Release: 2.3-PreRelease-10/19/2009
>
>
> On Friday 15 January 2010 12:11:12 Peter wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Jose Blanca <jblanca@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > The latest (yet unreleased) one. I did it with the -cdna option. The
> > > theory is very nice, because it returns "transcripts" (names isotigs)
> and
> > > "genes" (named isogroups), but the result is awful.
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Jose Blanca
> >
> > Do you mean Newbler gsAssembler 2.3 which includes improved EST
> > assembly (released at the end of last year I think)? Or something even
> > newer?
> >
> > Peter
>
>
>
> --
> Jose M. Blanca Postigo
> Instituto Universitario de Conservacion y
> Mejora de la Agrodiversidad Valenciana (COMAV)
> Universidad Politecnica de Valencia (UPV)
> Edificio CPI (Ciudad Politecnica de la Innovacion), 8E
> 46022 Valencia (SPAIN)
> Tlf.:+34-96-3877000 (ext 88473)
>
> --
> You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk
> mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please
> visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html
>
Other related posts:
