On 21/02/11 10:02, Yvan Wenger wrote:
[...] I am satisfied with the assembly itself, but performing a blast tells me that 1437 sanger reads I inputed do not have any counterpart in the cleaned_out.unpadded.fasta file... how can that be? On what basis are these sequences discarded? I will end up fetching all those sanger input that do not have a hit in the final fasta file produced, but I am still curious.
Hi, Yvan. How did you create your Sanger contigs?I would try a mapping assembly to see where the 454 reads map onto the Sanger contigs, used as a 'backbone' instead of Sanger pseudo-reads.
However, I think that it's possible the other assembler you used to create the Sanger contigs has collapsed repeats that MIRA resolved.
Unless, of course, your other assembler was MIRA ;-) Bye, Tony. -- Dr. A.J.Travis, University of Aberdeen, Rowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, Scotland, UK tel +44(0)1224 712751, fax +44(0)1224 716687, http://www.rowett.ac.uk mailto:a.travis@xxxxxxxxxx, http://bioinformatics.rri.sari.ac.uk -- You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html