Bastien Chevreux wrote: > > I’ve looked around SF and there is, I think, no ideal solution to this > dilemma: > > 1. One way could be to go via > "http://sourceforge.net/projects/mira-assembler/files/latest/download” By > setting a fake browser ID string with curl/wget one even gets redirected to > the binary version “wanted”. Would that be a possibility for the Galaxy > install wrapper? I’m keeping these “links” updated. > 2. I could try to create vie the SF shell interface softlinks which would > point from something like “current/linux-bin.tar.bz2” to the current version. > However, I’m not completely sure this is doable … and whether I would always > remeber to do that. > 3. I switch to a directory structure many other projects use: > “something/4.0”, "something/4.0.1", “something/3.9.5” etc.pp. The downloads > in these subdirectories would have stable URLs. However, here too I would, > after some time, delete some older binary packages. Especially if some severe > bug is present in those versions which has been fixed in later revisions. > > Any comment regarding what would be preferable? I just had a look how Gentoo fetches the source tarballs for other tools from sourceforge and seems best would be: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mira/files/mira/4.0.2/... Do not know why the package name appears twice in the URLs but is same for all packages I looked at. Currently, Gentoo uses: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mira-assembler/files/MIRA/stable/"${PN}"-"${MY_PV}".tar.bz2 http://sourceforge.net/projects/mira-assembler/files/MIRA/development/${P}.tar.bz2 Martin -- You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html