Re: opcode order about BC_CALLMT and BC_CALLT
- From: Mike Pall <mikelj-2001@xxxxxxx>
- To: luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:29:40 +0100
Baozeng wrote:
LJ_STATIC_ASSERT((int)BC_CALLMT + 1 == (int)BC_CALLT);
why? what piece of code in the source causes that BC_CALLMT and BC_CALLT
order must have the above relationship? Thank you.
The bytecode interpreter in (some) vm_*.dasc. Look for BC_CALLMT.
--Mike
Other related posts:
