Re: [PATCH] OSX: Mach-O object file output
- From: Adam Strzelecki <ono@xxxxxxx>
- To: "luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 00:28:30 +0100
Good idea. Indeed several sections can point to the same offset in file. I'll
check tmr if this won't produce stupid warnings in ld about unused
architecture, when not linking exec to all present in obj.
Thanks for your feedback.
--
Adam Strzelecki | nanoant.com | Sent from my iPhone
Dnia 1 lis 2012 o godz. 00:39 Mike Pall <mike-1211@xxxxxxxxxx> napisaÅ(a):
> Adam Strzelecki wrote:
>> So only reliable option that does succeed without any warnings
>> is producing object file for each/specific ARM subtype (see my
>> latest patch).
>
> Or simply always generate a FAT object file which contains all iOS
> ARM variants. As far as I understood, the actual data content in
> the file (the bytecode) can be shared.
>
> --Mike
>
Other related posts:
