On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 1:07 PM Sam Putman <atmanistan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Er, this was a bit off-the cuff.
Thanks, this was the prompt I needed to figure out what was going on.
For the sake of others who may encounter this difficulty:
bytecode generated with `string.load(fn)` (note the lack of a second
parameter) and loaded with LuaL_loadbuffer will ignore the value of `*name`
and give it a generic [string "..."] name instead.
if instead one uses `string.load(fn, "")`, the string contents doesn't
matter
because LuaL_loadbuffer will use whatever string one passes it in `*name`.
