On 12 August 2012 22:32, Mike Pall <mike-1208@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Would be interesting to see the results for Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9 > cores of recent smartphones, in comparison. > > BTW: An Intel Core 2 E8400 3.0 GHz gets a score of ~780 and > an Intel Atom N270 1.6 GHz gets a score of ~125. > > --Mike > > On my beagleboard xM (Cortex A8) hard float: > $ luajit scimark.lua > Lua SciMark 2010-12-10 based on SciMark 2.0a. Copyright (C) 2006-2010 Mike > Pall. > FFT 18.23 [1024] > SOR 55.25 [100] > MC 19.74 > SPARSE 40.55 [1000, 5000] > LU 28.26 [100] > SciMark 32.40 [small problem sizes] soft with VFP: > $ luajit scimark.lua > Lua SciMark 2010-12-10 based on SciMark 2.0a. Copyright (C) 2006-2010 Mike > Pall. > FFT 18.29 [1024] > SOR 54.25 [100] > MC 19.23 > SPARSE 37.75 [1000, 5000] > LU 31.72 [100] > SciMark 32.25 [small problem sizes] soft: $ ./luajit-2.0/src/luajit scimark.lua Lua SciMark 2010-12-10 based on SciMark 2.0a. Copyright (C) 2006-2010 Mike > Pall. > FFT 4.41 [1024] SOR 14.91 [100] > MC 6.88 > SPARSE 7.39 [1000, 5000] > LU 10.26 [100] > SciMark 8.77 [small problem sizes]